Visibility of urban activities and pedestrian routes: An experiment in a virtual environment
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There has been a growing overlap between graph-based models and research of human spatial and visual cognition and navigation.
“In recent years, there has been a strong degree of growing overlap between graph-based models and the research of human spatial and visual cognition and navigation (Natapov and Fisher-Gewirtzman 2016;Franz et al. 2005;Hölscher et al. 2006).”
From A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location (2018) · cites this paper as Natapov and Fisher-Gewirtzman 2016
Cites
Batty, M. (2013) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9399.001.0001 · Cited by 1,700 · see citing works
Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b200029 · Cited by 1,581 · see citing works
From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O'Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b2684 · Cited by 969 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, visibility graph analysis is applied to characterize a built environment by imposing either a regular or an irregular grid on top of the space accessible for movement (De Floriani & Magillo, 1994; Krüger, 1979; Turner et al., 2001).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location
Natapov, A., Czamanski, D., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2018) · Networks and Spatial Economics · doi:10.1007/s11067-018-9411-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationVerma, D. (2025) · Journal of Urban Design · doi:10.1080/13574809.2025.2514574 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
POI VizNet: New QGIS Tool to construct Visibility Networks in Cities
Natapov, A., Dalyot, S., & Cohen, A. (2024) · ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences · doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-2024-239-2024 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Natapov, A., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Natapov, A.
- Venue
- Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 60-70
- ISSN
- 0198-9715 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2336547455
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers Environment and Urban Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Keywords
- pedestrian route choice, pedestrian navigation, virtual reality experiments, graph centrality, random walk simulation, urban morphology, human spatial behavior, immersive virtual environments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review