Cited by 18Data Stream Mining TechniquesIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Incremental learning of concept drift in Multiple Instance Learning for industrial visual inspection

Mera, Carlos, Orozco-Alzate, Mauricio, Branch, John·2019·Computers in Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.006

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mera, C., Orozco-Alzate, M., & Branch, J.
Affiliations
  • Institución Universitaria ITM (CO)
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO)
Corresponding author
Mera, Carlos
Venue
Computers in Industry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
109
Pages
153-164
ISSN
0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943993519
Cited by
18
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Industry (publishedVersion)
Funders
COLCIENCIAS - Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Stream Mining Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
multiple instance learning, concept drift, incremental learning, non-stationary data, industrial visual inspection, defect detection, online learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review