Cited by 201Digital Transformation in IndustryDigital Innovation in IndustriesInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers

Open access
Gökalp, Ebru, Martinez, Veronica·2021·Computers in Industry

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compind.2021.103522

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Automation, 2014, The connected enterprise maturity model, Rockwell Autom., 12
  2. Automotive, 2010, Automotive SPICE process assessment model, Final Release, 4, 46
  3. Leyh, 2016, 8, 1297
  4. Leyh, 2017, 277, 103
  5. Lichtblau, 2015, IMPULS-industrie 4.0-readiness, Impuls. des VDMA, Aachen-Köln
  6. Şener, 2018, Toward a maturity model for Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review and a model proposal, 291
  7. University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing, 2019
  8. University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing, 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 201

Metadata

Authors
Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Gökalp, Ebru
Venue
Computers in Industry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
132
Pages
103522
ISSN
0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3184834255
Cited by
200
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 2
FWCI
17.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Industry (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
digital transformation, maturity model, manufacturing companies, gap analysis, digital maturity assessment, improvement roadmap, benchmarking, chemical industry, machine-building industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review