The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For resource-constrained SMEs, streamlined and flexible maturity models provide actionable roadmaps while avoiding the diagnostic overload common in enterprise-scale frameworks (Schumacher et al., 2016;Mittal et al., 2018;Gökalp & Martinez, 2021).”
From Digital transformation: a comparative analysis of SME digital maturity models (2025) · cites this paper as Gökalp & Martinez, 2021
In the citing paper
“Secondly, there is a paucity of cross-industry evidence on the performance payoff of progressing through maturity (Teichert, 2019;Gökalp & Martinez, 2021).”
From Digital transformation: a comparative analysis of SME digital maturity models (2025) · cites this paper as Gökalp & Martinez, 2021
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,904
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205
Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022 · Cited by 5,720
(2015) · Cited by 3,471
Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.4.23 · Cited by 3,335
The fourth industrial revolution
Schwab, K. 1. (n.d.) · Cited by 3,008
Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data
Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2018) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 · Cited by 2,920
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D., Levy, F. S., & Murnane, R. J. (2001) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w8337 · Cited by 2,633
A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 · Cited by 1,766
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Automation, 2014, The connected enterprise maturity model, Rockwell Autom., 12
- Automotive, 2010, Automotive SPICE process assessment model, Final Release, 4, 46
- Leyh, 2016, 8, 1297
- Leyh, 2017, 277, 103
- Lichtblau, 2015, IMPULS-industrie 4.0-readiness, Impuls. des VDMA, Aachen-Köln
- Şener, 2018, Toward a maturity model for Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review and a model proposal, 291
- University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing, 2019
- University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1991020 · Cited by 220
Self-citationNasiri, M., Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2022) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-09-2021-0616 · Cited by 210
A systematic review and framework for digital leadership research maturity in higher education
Jameson, J., Rumyantseva, N. L., Cai, M., Markowski, M., Essex, R., & McNay, I. (2022) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100115 · Cited by 177
Aras, A., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11040213 · Cited by 101
Neri, A., Negri, M., Cagno, E., Kumar, P. V., & Garza‐Reyes, J. A. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3409 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gökalp, Ebru
- Venue
- Computers in Industry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 103522
- ISSN
- 0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3184834255
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.scopus.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Industry (publishedVersion)
- OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- digital transformation, maturity model, manufacturing companies, gap analysis, digital maturity assessment, improvement roadmap, benchmarking, chemical industry, machine-building industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review