The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For resource-constrained SMEs, streamlined and flexible maturity models provide actionable roadmaps while avoiding the diagnostic overload common in enterprise-scale frameworks (Schumacher et al., 2016;Mittal et al., 2018;Gökalp & Martinez, 2021).”
From Digital transformation: a comparative analysis of SME digital maturity models (2025) · cites this paper as Gökalp & Martinez, 2021
In the citing paper
“Secondly, there is a paucity of cross-industry evidence on the performance payoff of progressing through maturity (Teichert, 2019;Gökalp & Martinez, 2021).”
From Digital transformation: a comparative analysis of SME digital maturity models (2025) · cites this paper as Gökalp & Martinez, 2021
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,904
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205
Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022 · Cited by 5,720
(2015) · Cited by 3,471
Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.4.23 · Cited by 3,335
The fourth industrial revolution
Schwab, K. 1. (n.d.) · Cited by 3,008
Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data
Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2018) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 · Cited by 2,920
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D., Levy, F. S., & Murnane, R. J. (2001) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w8337 · Cited by 2,633
A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 · Cited by 1,766
Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison
Qi, Q., & Tao, F. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2793265 · Cited by 1,716
(2021) · Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95963-4_300069 · Cited by 1,585
Empire of cotton: a global history
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.189347 · Cited by 1,000
Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model
de Bruin, T., Freeze, R., Kulkarni, U. R., & Rosemann, M. (2005) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 848
Guerra, A. G., & de Gómez, L. S. (2018) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5837-8.ch009 · Cited by 831
Li, F. (2018) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.004 · Cited by 807
Fu, X., Pietrobelli, C., & Soete, L. L. G. (2011) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.05.009 · Cited by 770
Empire of Cotton: A Global History
(2015) · Journal of American History · doi:10.1093/jahist/jav525 · Cited by 718
Maturity models in business process management
Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J., & Becker, J. (2012) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637151211225225 · Cited by 604
Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2008) · Oxford Development Studies · doi:10.1080/13600810701848144 · Cited by 577
Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things
Gilchrist, A. (2016) · Cited by 472
Smart Factory Implementation and Process Innovation
Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Leksell, M., & Petrović, A. (2018) · Research-Technology Management · doi:10.1080/08956308.2018.1471277 · Cited by 413
A Maturity Model for Assessing the Digital Readiness of Manufacturing Companies
Carolis, A. D., Macchi, M., Negri, E., & Terzi, S. (2017) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_2 · Cited by 360
Three stage maturity model in SME’s toward industry 4.0
Ganzarain, J., & Errasti, N. (2016) · Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management · doi:10.3926/jiem.2073 · Cited by 352
Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends
Tao, F., Cheng, Y., Li, Z., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2015) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1042-8 · Cited by 335
Business process maturity models: A systematic literature review
Tarhan, A., Türetken, O., & Reijers, H. A. (2016) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.010 · Cited by 326
Development of an Assessment Model for Industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM
Gökalp, E., Şener, U., & Eren, P. E. (2017) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_10 · Cited by 318
Self-citationSchumacher, A., Nemeth, T., & Sihn, W. (2019) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.110 · Cited by 258
A Digital Maturity Model for Telecommunications Service Providers
Valdez-de-Leon, O. (2016) · Technology Innovation Management Review · doi:10.22215/timreview/1008 · Cited by 239
Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1991020 · Cited by 220
Self-citationA maturity assessment approach for conceiving context-specific roadmaps in the Industry 4.0 era
Colli, M., Berger, U., Bockholt, M. T., Madsen, O., Møller, C., & Wæhrens, B. V. (2019) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.06.001 · Cited by 218
A critque of the stage hypothesis
Benbasat, I., Dexter, A. S., Drury, D. H., & Goldstein, R. C. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358189.358076 · Cited by 201
Development of an Industry 4.0 maturity model for the delivery process in supply chains
Asdecker, B., & Felch, V. (2018) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/jm2-03-2018-0042 · Cited by 140
People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) Version 2.0
Curtis, B., Hefley, W. E., & Miller, S. A. (2001) · doi:10.21236/ada388676 · Cited by 130
Digital transformation challenges
Henriette, E., Feki, M., & Boughzala, I. (2016) · HAL · Cited by 129
Contextualizing the outcome of a maturity assessment for Industry 4.0
Colli, M., Madsen, O., Berger, U., Møller, C., Wæhrens, B. V., & Bockholt, M. T. (2018) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.343 · Cited by 128
Towards a Smart Manufacturing Maturity Model for SMEs (SM3E)
Mittal, S., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2018) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99707-0_20 · Cited by 110
Demonstrating the Impact and Benefits of CMMI: An Update and Preliminary Results
Goldenson, D. R., & Gibson, D. L. (2003) · Figshare · doi:10.1184/r1/6572969 · Cited by 110
A Design Science Research Perspective on Maturity Models in Information Systems
Mettler, T. (2009) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · Cited by 105
Thinking in Terms of Design Decisions When Developing Maturity Models
Mettler, T. (2010) · International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences · doi:10.4018/jsds.2010100105 · Cited by 94
Data-driven manufacturing: An assessment model for data science maturity
Gökalp, M. O., Gökalp, E., Kayabay, K., Koçyiğit, A., & Eren, P. E. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.07.011 · Cited by 92
Self-citationWilliams, P. A. H., Lovelock, B., Cabarrus, J. A., & Harvey, M. (2018) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/12465 · Cited by 89
Developing a maturity model for service systems in heavy equipment manufacturing enterprises
Neff, A. A., Hamel, F., Herz, T. P., Uebernickel, F., Brenner, W., & Brocke, J. V. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.05.001 · Cited by 72
People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) Version 2.0
Curtis, W., Hefley, W. A., & Miller, S. A. (2001) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.1184/r1/6581879 · Cited by 66
McCaffery, F., & Dorling, A. (2009) · Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution Research and Practice · doi:10.1002/spip.439 · Cited by 39
Gökalp, M. O., Kayabay, K., Gökalp, E., Koçyiğit, A., & Eren, P. E. (2021) · IET Software · doi:10.1049/sfw2.12033 · Cited by 27
Self-citationApplication of a software agility assessment model – AgilityMod in the field
Özcan‐Top, Ö., & Demirörs, O. (2018) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2018.07.002 · Cited by 24
Model based process assessment for public financial and physical resource management processes
Gökalp, E., & Demirörs, O. (2016) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2016.11.011 · Cited by 22
Self-citationIndustry 4.0 from the MIS Perspective
Gülseçen, S., Reis, Z. A., Gezer, M., & Erol, Ç. (2019) · Peter Lang D eBooks · doi:10.3726/b15120 · Cited by 22
The Industrial Internet and the Future of Work
Annunziata, M., & Biller, S. R. (2015) · Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.2015-sep-1 · Cited by 15
Operational excellence driven by process maturity reviews: A case study of the ABB corporation
Isoherranen, V., Karkkainen, M. K., & Kess, P. (2015) · doi:10.1109/ieem.2015.7385872 · Cited by 15
Enterprise SPICE Based Education Capability Maturity Model
Mitašiūnas, A., & Novickis, L. (2012) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29231-6_9 · Cited by 15
Gökalp, E., Kayabay, K., & Gökalp, M. O. (2021) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67716-9_10 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Automation, 2014, The connected enterprise maturity model, Rockwell Autom., 12
- Automotive, 2010, Automotive SPICE process assessment model, Final Release, 4, 46
- Leyh, 2016, 8, 1297
- Leyh, 2017, 277, 103
- Lichtblau, 2015, IMPULS-industrie 4.0-readiness, Impuls. des VDMA, Aachen-Köln
- Şener, 2018, Toward a maturity model for Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review and a model proposal, 291
- University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing, 2019
- University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1991020 · Cited by 220
Self-citationNasiri, M., Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2022) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-09-2021-0616 · Cited by 210
A systematic review and framework for digital leadership research maturity in higher education
Jameson, J., Rumyantseva, N. L., Cai, M., Markowski, M., Essex, R., & McNay, I. (2022) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100115 · Cited by 177
Aras, A., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11040213 · Cited by 101
Neri, A., Negri, M., Cagno, E., Kumar, P. V., & Garza‐Reyes, J. A. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3409 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gökalp, Ebru
- Venue
- Computers in Industry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 103522
- ISSN
- 0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3184834255
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.scopus.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Industry (publishedVersion)
- OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- digital transformation, maturity model, manufacturing companies, gap analysis, digital maturity assessment, improvement roadmap, benchmarking, chemical industry, machine-building industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review