Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 840

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain tumor classification for MR images using transfer learning and fine-tuning

Swati, Zar Nawab Khan, Zhao, Qinghua, Kabir, Muhammad, Ali, Farman, Ali, Zakir, Ahmed, Saeed, Lu, Jianfeng·2019·Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

Abstract

Accurate and precise brain tumor MR images classification plays important role in clinical diagnosis and decision making for patient treatment. The key challenge in MR images classification is the semantic gap between the low-level visual information captured by the MRI machine and the high-level information perceived by the human evaluator. The traditional machine learning techniques for classification focus only on low-level or high-level features, use some handcrafted features to reduce this gap and require good feature extraction and classification methods. Recent development on deep learning has shown great progress and deep convolution neural networks (CNNs) have succeeded in the images classification task. Deep learning is very powerful for feature representation that can depict low-level and high-level information completely and embed the phase of feature extraction and classification into self-learning but require large training dataset in general. For most of the medical imaging scenario, the training datasets are small, therefore, it is a challenging task to apply the deep learning and train CNN from scratch on the small dataset. Aiming this problem, we use pre-trained deep CNN model and propose a block-wise fine-tuning strategy based on transfer learning. The proposed method is evaluated on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images (CE-MRI) benchmark dataset. Our method is more generic as it does not use any handcrafted features, requires minimal preprocessing and can achieve average accuracy of 94.82% under five-fold cross-validation. We compare our results not only with the traditional machine learning but also with deep learning methods using CNNs. Experimental results show that our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art classification on the CE-MRI dataset.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.05.001

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Avni, 2011, X-ray categorization and retrieval on the organ and pathology level, using patch-based visual words, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 30, 733, 10.1109/TMI.2010.2095026 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bengio, 2009, Learning deep architectures for AI, Found. Trends® Mach. Learn., 2, 1, 10.1561/2200000006 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chen, 2015, Standard plane localization in fetal ultrasound via domain transferred deep neural networks, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., 19, 1627, 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2425041 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chen, 2016, Deep contextual networks for neuronal structure segmentation, AAAI, 1167
  5. Cheng, 2017, Brain tumor dataset, figshare. Dataset.
  6. Cheng, 2016, Retrieval of brain tumors by adaptive spatial pooling and Fisher vector representation, PLoS One, 11
  7. Gao, 2016, Holistic classification of CT attenuation patterns for interstitial lung diseases via deep convolutional neural networks, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis., 1
  8. Greenspan, 2016, Guest editorial deep learning in medical imaging: overview and future promise of an exciting new technique, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 35, 1153, 10.1109/TMI.2016.2553401 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hinton, 2006, Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks, Science, 313, 504, 10.1126/science.1127647 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Javed, 2013, MRI brain classification using texture features, fuzzy weighting and support vector machine, Prog. Electromagn. Res. B, 53, 73, 10.2528/PIERB13052805 · DOI
  11. Jiang, 2013, 3D brain tumor segmentation in multimodal MR images based on learning population-and patient-specific feature sets, Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., 37, 512, 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2013.05.007 · DOI
  12. John, 2012, Brain tumor classification using wavelet and texture based neural network, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 3, 1
  13. Margeta, 2017, Fine-tuned convolutional neural nets for cardiac MRI acquisition plane recognition, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis., 5, 339, 10.1080/21681163.2015.1061448 · DOI
  14. Paul, 2017, Deep learning for brain tumor classification, medical imaging 2017: biomedical applications in molecular, structural, and functional imaging, International Society for Optics and Photonics, p.
  15. Selvaraj, 2007, Brain MRI slices classification using least squares support vector machine, Int. J. Intell. Comput. Med. Sci. Image Process., 1, 21
  16. Simonyan, 2014, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, arXiv preprint
  17. Srivastava, 2014, Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1929
  18. Suk, 2016, State-space model with deep learning for functional dynamics estimation in resting-state fMRI, NeuroImage, 129, 292, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Szegedy, 2013, Deep neural networks for object detection, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2553
  20. Yang, 2012, Content‐based retrieval of brain tumor in contrast‐enhanced MRI images using tumor margin information and learned distance metric, Med. Phys., 39, 6929, 10.1118/1.4754305 · DOI
  21. Yang, 2012, Content-based retrieval of focal liver lesions using bag-of-visual-words representations of single-and multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images, J. Digit. Imaging, 25, 708, 10.1007/s10278-012-9495-1 · DOI
  22. Zhang, 2015, Deep neural networks in machine translation: an overview, IEEE Intell. Syst., 30, 16, 10.1109/MIS.2015.69 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 840

Metadata

Authors
Swati, Z. N. K., Zhao, Q., Kabir, M., Ali, F., Ali, Z., Ahmed, S., & Lu, J.
Venue
Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
75
Pages
34-46
ISSN
  • 0730-4862 (ISSN-L)
  • 0895-6111
OpenAlex
W2945839551
Cited by
840
References
24
FWCI
27.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1004)
  • 111 Project (B13022)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (20131351)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain tumor classification for MR images using transfer learning and fine-tuning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.05.001
The paper
Swati, Z. N. K., Zhao, Q., Kabir, M., Ali, F., Ali, Z., Ahmed, S., & Lu, J. (2019). Brain tumor classification for MR images using transfer learning and fine-tuning. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.05.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.