Cited by 379Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Standard Plane Localization in Fetal Ultrasound via Domain Transferred Deep Neural Networks

Chen, Hao, Ni, Dong, Qin, Jing, Li, Shengli, Yang, Xin, Wang, Tianfu, Heng, Pheng Ann·2015·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Automatic localization of the standard plane containing complicated anatomical structures in ultrasound (US) videos remains a challenging problem. In this paper, we present a learning-based approach to locate the fetal abdominal standard plane (FASP) in US videos by constructing a domain transferred deep convolutional neural network (CNN). Compared with previous works based on low-level features, our approach is able to represent the complicated appearance of the FASP and hence achieve better classification performance. More importantly, in order to reduce the overfitting problem caused by the small amount of training samples, we propose a transfer learning strategy, which transfers the knowledge in the low layers of a base CNN trained from a large database of natural images to our task-specific CNN. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method for the FASP localization as well as the CNN only trained on the limited US training samples. The proposed approach can be easily extended to other similar medical image computing problems, which often suffer from the insufficient training samples when exploiting the deep CNN to represent high-level features.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2015.2425041

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H., Ni, D., Qin, J., Li, S., Yang, X., Wang, T., & Heng, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital (CN)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2015-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
1627-1636
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2061715187
Cited by
379
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 2
FWCI
26.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81270707, 61233012)
  • Shenzhen Key Basic Research Project (JCYJ20130329105033277, JCYJ20140509172609164)
  • Shenzhen-Hong Kong Innovation Circle Funding Program (JSE201109150013A, SGLH20131010151755080)
  • Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Fund (GHP/003/11SZ, GHP/002/13SZ)
  • Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (CUHK412510)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound, domain transfer, transfer learning, convolutional neural networks, limited training data, overfitting, medical image classification
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Female, Fetus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, ROC Curve, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review