Cited by 47Model Reduction and Neural NetworksStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesControl Systems and Identification

Probabilistic machine learning based predictive and interpretable digital twin for dynamical systems

Open access
Tripura, Tapas, Desai, Aarya Sheetal, Adhikari, Sondipon, Chakraborty, Souvik·2023·Computers & Structures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107008

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tripura et al. [142] proposed an interpretable ML approach for updating DTs.

    “Tripura et al. [142] proposed an interpretable ML approach for updating DTs.”
  • Their method utilizes interpretable physical and mathematical functions to model the dynamics of real world systems.

    “Their method utilizes interpretable physical and mathematical functions to model the dynamics of real world systems.”
  • By leveraging sparse Bayesian regression, the approach accurately identifies critical components representing perturbation terms in the physical twins' underlying dynamics, ensuring precise updates to digital twins.

    “By leveraging sparse Bayesian regression, the approach accurately identifies critical components representing perturbation terms in the physical twins' underlying dynamics, ensuring precise updates to digital twins.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tripura, T., Desai, A. S., Adhikari, S., & Chakraborty, S.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Tripura, Tapas
  • Chakraborty, Souvik
Venue
Computers & Structures
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
281
Pages
107008
ISSN
0045-7949 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323662809
Cited by
47
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Structures (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, India
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
  • Science and Engineering Research Board (SRG/2021/000467)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
digital twin, sparse Bayesian learning, dynamical systems, physics-informed surrogate models, output-only modal identification, epistemic uncertainty quantification, Itô calculus, Kramers-Moyal expansion, model updating, degradation monitoring, cyber-physical integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review