Cited by 256Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchCellular transport and secretion

Synaptic development: insights from Drosophila

Collins, Catherine A, DiAntonio, Aaron·2007·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

In Drosophila, the larval neuromuscular junction is particularly tractable for studying how synapses develop and function. In contrast to vertebrate central synapses, each presynaptic motor neuron and postsynaptic muscle cell is unique and identifiable, and the wiring circuit is invariant. Thus, the full power of Drosophila genetics can be brought to bear on a single, reproducibly identifiable, synaptic terminal. Each individual neuromuscular junction encompasses hundreds of synaptic neurotransmitter release sites housed in a chain of synaptic boutons. Recent advances have increased our understanding of the mechanisms that shape the development of both individual synapses--that is, the transmitter release sites including active zones and their apposed glutamate receptor clusters--and the whole synaptic terminal that connects a pre- and post-synaptic cell.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2007.01.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is a glutamatergic synapse that has proven to be a good model system to study synaptic development and plasticity.

    “The Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is a glutamatergic synapse that has proven to be a good model system to study synaptic development and plasticity (Collins and DiAntonio, 2007).”
  • The glutamatergic NMJ of Drosophila has provided insight into molecular pathways of synaptic development and function that are shared with mammalian synapses.

    “The glutamatergic NMJ of Drosophila has provided insight into molecular pathways of synaptic development and function (Collins and DiAntonio, 2007) that are shared with mammalian synapses.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, C. A., & DiAntonio, A.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
DiAntonio, Aaron
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
35-42
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137214779
Cited by
256
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Paralyzed Veterans of America
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS043171, R01NS051453, R01NS043171, NS051453)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
synaptic development, neuromuscular junction, Drosophila, motor neurons, muscle cells, synaptic boutons, active zone, glutamate receptors
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Drosophila, Larva, Neuromuscular Junction, Synapses, Signal Transduction, Receptors, Glutamate, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Glutamic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review