Cited by 252Autophagy in Disease and TherapyNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Autophagy promotes synapse development in Drosophila

Open access
Shen, Wei, Ganetzky, Barry·2009·Journal of Cell Biology

Abstract

Autophagy, a lysosome-dependent degradation mechanism, mediates many biological processes, including cellular stress responses and neuroprotection. In this study, we demonstrate that autophagy positively regulates development of the Drosophila melanogaster larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Autophagy induces an NMJ overgrowth phenotype closely resembling that of highwire (hiw), an E3 ubiquitin ligase mutant. Moreover, like hiw, autophagy-induced NMJ overgrowth is suppressed by wallenda (wnd) and by a dominant-negative c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (bskDN). We show that autophagy promotes NMJ growth by reducing Hiw levels. Thus, autophagy and the ubiquitin–proteasome system converge in regulating synaptic development. Because autophagy is triggered in response to many environmental cues, our findings suggest that it is perfectly positioned to link environmental conditions with synaptic growth and plasticity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1083/jcb.200907109

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, W., & Ganetzky, B.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Ganetzky, Barry
Venue
Journal of Cell Biology
Published
2009-09-28
Volume
187
Issue
1
Pages
71-79
ISSN
  • 0021-9525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8140
OpenAlex
W2122791600
Cited by
252
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Cell Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS15390, R01NS015390)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
autophagy, neuromuscular junction formation, synaptic development, Highwire, E3 ubiquitin ligase, c-Jun NH2-kinase, ubiquitin-proteasome system, Drosophila melanogaster, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Amines, Animals, Autophagy, Drosophila, Fluorescent Dyes, Horseradish Peroxidase, Immunohistochemistry, Larva, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuromuscular Junction, Synapses, Fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate, MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases, Drosophila Proteins, JNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review