Cited by 79Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsEmpathy and Medical EducationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Role of theory of mind in emotional awareness and alexithymia: Implications for conceptualization and measurement

Lane, Richard D., Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, Locke, Dona E.C., Ritenbaugh, Cheryl, Stonnington, Cynthia M.·2015·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether alexithymia, which is characterized by difficulty in recognizing and describing emotions, is associated with impairments in the ability to mentally represent emotional states. We studied 89 outpatients including 29 conversion disorder patients, 30 functional somatic syndrome [e.g. fibromyalgia] patients and 30 medical controls. Groups did not differ on affective or cognitive Theory of Mind (ToM) measures, the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS) or the Twenty-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) after adjusting for Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) variables. Across all patients, LEAS but not TAS-20 correlated positively with affective and cognitive ToM measures after adjusting for PANAS scores. Impairments in ToM functioning influence LEAS performance but not TAS-20 scores. These findings support the distinction between a milder "anomia" form of alexithymia associated with impaired emotion naming and a more severe "agnosia" form associated with impaired mental representation of emotion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.004

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most research contradicts the Moriguchi finding across a number of ToM tasks, including the Strange Stories Test and the false-belief task.

    “However, most research contradicts this finding across a number of ToM tasks, including the Strange Stories Test and the false-belief task (Lane, Hsu, Locke, Ritenbaugh, & Stonnington, 2015; Milosavljevic et al., 2016).”

    From ‘Theory of Mind’ is not Theory of Emotion: a cautionary note on the reading the Mind in the Eyes test (2016) · cites this paper as Lane, Hsu, Locke, Ritenbaugh, & Stonnington, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lane, R. D., Hsu, C.-H., Locke, D. E. C., Ritenbaugh, C., & Stonnington, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Lane, Richard D.
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
33
Pages
398-405
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972938577
Cited by
79
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Mental Health Research (#2008-LR-804)
  • Mayo Clinic (08-001718)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
theory of mind, emotional awareness, alexithymia, emotion naming, conversion disorder, fibromyalgia, functional somatic syndromes, Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale, Toronto Alexithymia Scale, emotion recognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Agnosia, Awareness, Emotions, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Somatoform Disorders, Young Adult, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review