Cited by 249Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Effect of Alexithymia on the Process and Outcome of Psychotherapy: A Programmatic Review

Ogrodniczuk, John S., Piper, William E., Joyce, Anthony S.·2011·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Most psychotherapeutic approaches assume that individuals have some access to their emotions. Thus, patients who are unable to identify, differentiate, and articulate their emotions present therapists with a difficult challenge. Such patients may suffer from alexithymia. Despite much attention in the clinical literature, research on alexithymia in the treatment setting has been sparse. Thus, many of the assumptions about psychotherapeutic treatment of alexithymic patients remain untested. This article summarizes findings from a series of studies that examined the effect of alexithymia on various aspects of the psychotherapeutic enterprise. Findings indicated that alexithymia has little effect on patients' treatment preferences, yet there was some tendency for alexithymic patients to prefer group therapy. However, alexithymia was associated with poor outcome in both traditional psychodynamic psychotherapy and supportive therapy. This negative effect was found in individual and group psychotherapies. In the context of group therapy, higher levels of alexithymic features elicited negative reactions from one's therapist, which partially contributed to the poor outcome experienced by such patients. Finally, the negative reaction that therapists had toward patients with high alexithymia appeared to be in response to the lack of positive emotion expressed by these patients. Clinical implications and ideas for future research are considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.04.026

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogrodniczuk, J. S., Piper, W. E., & Joyce, A. S.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Ogrodniczuk, John S.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
190
Issue
1
Pages
43-48
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098604952
Cited by
249
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
alexithymia, psychotherapy outcome, treatment preferences, group therapy, individual psychotherapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy, supportive therapy, therapist reactions, emotional awareness, positive emotions
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review