Cited by 15Scientific Computing and Data ManagementGene Regulatory Network AnalysisResearch Data Management Practices

Standards, dissemination, and best practices in systems biology

Open access
Shin, Janis, Porubsky, Veronica, Carothers, James, Sauro, Herbert M·2023·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Abstract

The reproducibility of scientific research is crucial to the success of the scientific method. Here, we review the current best practices when publishing mechanistic models in systems biology. We recommend, where possible, to use software engineering strategies such as testing, verification, validation, documentation, versioning, iterative development, and continuous integration. In addition, adhering to the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable modeling principles allows other scientists to collaborate and build off of each other's work. Existing standards such as Systems Biology Markup Language, CellML, or Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language can greatly improve the likelihood that a published model is reproducible, especially if such models are deposited in well-established model repositories. Where models are published in executable programming languages, the source code and their data should be published as open-source in public code repositories together with any documentation and testing code. For complex models, we recommend container-based solutions where any software dependencies and the run-time context can be easily replicated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2023.102922

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Murray-Smith DJ, Testing and validation of computer simulation models, Cham: Springer. doi 10 (2015) 978– 3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, J., Porubsky, V., Carothers, J., & Sauro, H. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Sauro, Herbert M
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
81
Pages
102922
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362450323
Cited by
15
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (P41GM109824, 1933453)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DEEE0008927)
  • University of Washington (1933453, P41GM109824)
  • National Institutes of Health (1933453)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM109824)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U24EB028887, P41EB023912)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
systems biology, mechanistic model, model reproducibility, software engineering best practices, model verification and validation, model testing, SBML, CellML, model repository, open source software, containerization, continuous integration, model documentation
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Models, Biological, Programming Languages, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review