Cited by 92Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The role of testosterone in human romantic relationships

Roney, James R, Gettler, Lee T·2015·Current Opinion in Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.003

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roney, J. R., & Gettler, L. T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Roney, James R
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
1
Pages
81-86
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017178124
Cited by
92
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
testosterone, romantic relationships, pair bonding, relationship initiation, relationship maintenance, parental investment, sexual selection, hormone signaling, human mating behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review