Cited by 321Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The Steroid/Peptide Theory of Social Bonds: Integrating testosterone and peptide responses for classifying social behavioral contexts

van Anders, Sari M., Goldey, Katherine L., Kuo, Patty X.·2011·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Hormones, and hormone responses to social contexts, are the proximate mechanisms of evolutionary pathways to pair bonds and other social bonds. Testosterone (T) is implicated in tradeoffs relevant to pair bonding, and oxytocin (OT) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) are positively tied to social bonding in a variety of species. Here, we present the Steroid/Peptide Theory of Social Bonds (S/P Theory), which integrates T and peptides to provide a model, set of predictions, and classification system for social behavioral contexts related to social bonds. The S/P Theory also resolves several paradoxes apparent in the literature on social bonds and hormones: the Offspring Defense Paradox, Aggression Paradox, and Intimacy Paradox. In the S/P Theory, we partition aggression into antagonistic and protective aggression, which both increase T but exert distinct effects on AVP and thus social bonds. Similarly, we partition intimacy into sexual and nurturant intimacy, both of which increase OT and facilitate social bonds, but exert distinct effects on T. We describe the utility of the S/P Theory for classifying 'tricky' behavioral contexts on the basis of their hormonal responses using partner cuddling, a behavior which is assumed to be nurturant but increases T, as a test case of the S/P Theory. The S/P Theory provides a comparative basis for conceptualizing and testing evolved hormonal pathways to pair bonds with attention to species, context, and gender/sex specificities and convergences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.06.001

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Anders, S. M., Goldey, K. L., & Kuo, P. X.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
1265-1275
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160353830
Cited by
321
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
pair bonding, social bonds, testosterone, oxytocin, vasopressin, social behavior, aggression, intimacy, hormone signaling pathways, sex differences, evolutionary psychology
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Biological, Models, Theoretical, Pair Bond, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Testosterone, Peptide Hormones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review