CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 385Sport Psychology and PerformanceMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsSports and Physical Education Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coaching effectiveness: the coach–athlete relationship at its heart

Open access
Jowett, Sophia·2017·Current Opinion in Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Coaching has been often viewed as a context within which coaches operate to largely bring about changes in athlete's performance and wellbeing. One key factor to successful outcomes in coaching is the quality of the relationship between coaches and athletes. In this article, I propose that the coach-athlete relationship is at the heart of coaching. Moreover, the aim is to describe and explain how the quality of the relationship coaches and athletes develop and maintain over the course of their sporting partnership alongside coaches and athletes' knowledge and outcomes, form a system that is capable of defining coaching effectiveness and success.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.006

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jowett, 2007, Too close for comfort? Dependence in the dual role of parent/coach-child/athlete relationship, Int. J. Coaching Sci., 1, 59
  2. Jowett S, Michel N, Yang S (2016). Coaching Relationships and Coaching Behaviours: What is the link? Manuscript under review.
  3. Jowett, 2008, Moderators and mediators of the association between the coach–athlete relationship and physical self-concept, Int. J. Coaching Sci., 2, 43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 385

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jowett, S.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Jowett, Sophia
ORCID
Jowett, Sophia
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
16
Pages
154-158
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.006
OpenAlex
W2620529264
Cited by
385
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
coaching effectiveness, coach-athlete relationship, coaching success, athletic performance, athlete well-being, coach knowledge, relationship quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review