Cited by 1,131Sport Psychology and PerformanceCoaching Methods and ImpactSports and Physical Education Research

An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise

Côté, Jean, Gilbert, Wade·2009·International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Abstract

The purpose of the current paper is to present an integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise that is both specific and conceptually grounded in the coaching, teaching, positive psychology, and athletes' development literature. The article is organized into six sections. The first section is used to situate the proposed definition in the predominant conceptual models of coaching. The second, third, and fourth sections provide detailed discussion about each of the three components of the proposed definition of coaching effectiveness: (a) coaches' knowledge, (b) athletes' outcomes, and (c) coaching contexts. The proposed definition is presented in the fifth section along with a clarification of common terminology and guiding postulates. The final section includes implications for practice and research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1260/174795409789623892

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has largely operationalised coaching effectiveness using Côté and Gilbert's definition.

    “Previous research has largely operationalised coaching effectiveness by employing Côté and Gilbert’s [41] proposed definition, “the consistent application of integrated professional, interpersonal and intrapersonal knowledge to improve athletes’ competence, confidence, connection, and character in specific coaching contexts” (Côté and Gilbert (2009, p.316).”
  • Specific characteristics of the instructor/coach of physical activity interventions may influence the effects on emotional well-being and behaviors of participants.

    “specific characteristics of the instructor/coach of the physical activity interventions (i.e., the level of moral reasoning, the extent of motivational behaviors of the instructor, the experience and knowledge with the target group) may influence the effects on emotional well-being and behaviors of participants of physical activity interventions”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Côté, J., & Gilbert, W.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • California State University, Fresno (US)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2009-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
307-323
ISSN
  • 1747-9541 (ISSN-L)
  • 2048-397X
OpenAlex
W2136418537
Cited by
1,131
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 112 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 29
FWCI
48.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching (publishedVersion)
  • QSpace (Queen's University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Coaching Methods and Impact
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
coaching effectiveness, coaching expertise, coaching context, positive psychology, athlete development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review