CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 370Mental Health Research TopicsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotion dynamics

Kuppens, Peter, Verduyn, Philippe·2017·Current Opinion in Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The study of emotion dynamics involves the study of the trajectories, patterns, and regularities with which emotions (or rather, the experiential, physiological, and behavioral elements that constitute an emotion) fluctuate across time, their underlying processes, and downstream consequences. Here, we formulate some of the basic principles underlying emotional change over time, discuss methods to study emotion dynamics, their relevance for psychological well-being, and a number of challenges and opportunities for the future.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.004

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Barrett LF: The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, in press.
  2. Résibois M, Verduyn P, Delaveau P, Rotge JY, Kuppens P, Van Mechelen I, Fossati P: The neural basis of emotions varies over time: different regions go with onset- and offset-bound processes underlying emotion intensity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 370

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kuppens, P., & Verduyn, P.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Kuppens, Peter
ORCID
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
17
Pages
22-26
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.004
OpenAlex
W4236061201
Cited by
369
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
KU Leuven Research Council (GOA/15/003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotional dynamics, emotion trajectories, emotion regulation, psychological well-being, emotion measurement
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Emotions, Humans, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review