Cited by 1,043Mental Health Research TopicsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis.

Houben, Marlies, Van Den Noortgate, Wim, Kuppens, Peter·2015·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Not only how good or bad people feel on average, but also how their feelings fluctuate across time is crucial for psychological health. The last 2 decades have witnessed a surge in research linking various patterns of short-term emotional change to adaptive or maladaptive psychological functioning, often with conflicting results. A meta-analysis was performed to identify consistent relationships between patterns of short-term emotion dynamics-including patterns reflecting emotional variability (measured in terms of within-person standard deviation of emotions across time), emotional instability (measured in terms of the magnitude of consecutive emotional changes), and emotional inertia of emotions over time (measured in terms of autocorrelation)-and relatively stable indicators of psychological well-being or psychopathology. We determined how such relationships are moderated by the type of emotional change, type of psychological well-being or psychopathology involved, valence of the emotion, and methodological factors. A total of 793 effect sizes were identified from 79 articles (N = 11,381) and were subjected to a 3-level meta-analysis. The results confirmed that overall, low psychological well-being co-occurs with more variable (overall ρ̂ = -.178), unstable (overall ρ̂ = -.205), but also more inert (overall ρ̂ = -.151) emotions. These effect sizes were stronger when involving negative compared with positive emotions. Moreover, the results provided evidence for consistency…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0038822

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The three-level random effects meta-analytic model allows all relevant effects reported in each primary study to be included, preserving all relevant information.

    “A major advantage of this three-level approach to meta-analysis is that all relevant effects reported in each primary study can be included, implying that all relevant information is preserved.”

    From Risk Factors for School Absenteeism and Dropout: A Meta-Analytic Review (2019) · cites this paper as Houben et al. 2015

  • A multilevel random effects model was applied to account for interdependency of effect sizes and differences in sample size.

    “To deal with this interdependency of effect sizes and the differences in sample size, we applied a multilevel random effects model (Houben, Van Den Noortgate, & Kuppens, 2015; Van Den Bussche, Van Den Noortgate, & Reynvoet, 2009; Viechtbauer, 2010; Viechtbauer, 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2015-07
Volume
141
Issue
4
Pages
901-930
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2003393830
Cited by
1,043
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 114 · 2025: 143 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
75.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Fund of KU Leuven - University of Leuven (GOA/15/003; OT/11/031)
  • Belgian government (IAP/P7/06)
  • Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
emotional variability, neuroticism, emotional inertia, psychological well-being, psychopathology, negative emotions, positive emotions, mood fluctuations, psychological flourishing, emotional functioning
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Problem Solving, Self Concept, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review