Cited by 144Mental Health via WritingEmotion and Mood RecognitionMental Health Research Topics

Predicting Depression From Language-Based Emotion Dynamics: Longitudinal Analysis of Facebook and Twitter Status Updates

Open access
Seabrook, Elizabeth M, Kern, Margaret L, Fulcher, Ben D, Rickard, Nikki S·2018·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Frequent expression of negative emotion words on social media has been linked to depression. However, metrics have relied on average values, not dynamic measures of emotional volatility. Objective: The aim of this study was to report on the associations between depression severity and the variability (time-unstructured) and instability (time-structured) in emotion word expression on Facebook and Twitter across status updates. Methods: Status updates and depression severity ratings of 29 Facebook users and 49 Twitter users were collected through the app MoodPrism. The average proportion of positive and negative emotion words used, within-person variability, and instability were computed. Results: Negative emotion word instability was a significant predictor of greater depression severity on Facebook (rs(29)=.44, P=.02, 95% CI 0.09-0.69), even after controlling for the average proportion of negative emotion words used (partial rs(26)=.51, P=.006) and within-person variability (partial rs(26)=.49, P=.009). A different pattern emerged on Twitter where greater negative emotion word variability indicated lower depression severity (rs(49)=−.34, P=.01, 95% CI −0.58 to 0.09). Differences between Facebook and Twitter users in their emotion word patterns and psychological characteristics were also explored. Conclusions: The findings suggest that negative emotion word instability may be a simple yet sensitive measure of time-structured variability, useful when screening for depression through social media, though its usefulness may depend on the social media platform.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.9267

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The frequent expression of negative emotion words on social media has been linked to depression.

    “The frequent expression of negative emotion words on social media has been linked to depression.”

    From Survey on AI-Based Multimodal Methods for Emotion Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]American Psychiatric Association Depressive disorders Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition 2013 Washington, DC, USA American Psychiatric Association
  2. [13]Schwartz HA Eichstaedt JC Kern M Characterizing geographic variation in well-being using Tweets Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) 2013 Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) July 8-11, 2013 Boston, MA, USA Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence
  3. [67]Correa D Silva LA Mondal M Benevenuto F Gummadi KP The many shades of anonymity: Characterizing anonymous social media content Proceeding of the Ninth International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2015 Ninth International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM May 26-29, 2015 Oxford, England AAAI Press 71 80
  4. [68]Lerman K Arora M Gallegos L Kumaraguru P Garcia D Emotions, demographics and sociability in Twitter interactions Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 2016 Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media May 17-20, 2016 Cologne, Germany AAAI Press 201 210

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seabrook, E. M., Kern, M. L., Fulcher, B. D., & Rickard, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Seabrook, Elizabeth M
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2018-05-08
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
e168
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801113291
Cited by
144
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
FWCI
16.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depression severity, emotional volatility, negative emotion words, social media, Facebook status updates, within-person variability, depression screening, platform differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Language, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review