Cited by 374

Prosocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts and definitions

Pfattheicher, Stefan, Nielsen, Yngwie Asbjørn, Thielmann, Isabel·2022·Current Opinion in Psychology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.021

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pfattheicher et al. supply the outcome/motive/norm taxonomy that this paper uses as an analytic instrument, but theirs is a typology of definitions rather than a measurement space.

    “Pfattheicher et al. (12) supply the outcome/motive/norm taxonomy that this paper uses as an analytic instrument, but theirs is a typology of definitions rather than a measurement space.”
  • The distinction among outcome-based, motive-based, and norm-based conceptions of altruism emphasizes respectively the consequences of an action, the individual's intentions, and the social or moral norms that guide behavior.

    “This issue is reflected in the distinction among outcome-based, motive-based, and norm-based conceptions of altruism, which emphasize respectively the consequences of an action, the individual's intentions, and the social or moral norms that guide behavior (12).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Staub E: Positive social behavior and morality. Academic Press; 1978, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-11528-0. · DOI
  2. Batson CD, Powell AA: Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Handb. Psychol.. Edited by Millon T, Lerner MJ, Weiner IB, John Wiley & Sons; 2003:463-484, https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0519. · DOI
  3. Zaki J, Mitchell JP: Intuitive prosociality. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2013, 22:466-470, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413492764. · DOI
  4. Batson CD: Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. In Prosocial motiv. Emot. Behav. Better angels our nat.. Edited by Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological As- sociation; 2010:15-34, https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-001. · DOI
  5. An intentionalist perspective is taken in this chapter. The argument is put forward that altruism is best understood and studied as a motiva- tional state. It is concluded that "true" altruism does exists and emerges in situations when one feels empathy for another person.
  6. Sober E, Wilson DS: Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1998.
  7. Macaulay J, Berkowitz L: Altruism and helping behavior: social psychological studies of some antecedents and consequences. New York: Academic Press; 1970.
  8. Hoffman ML: Is altruism part of human nature? J Pers Soc Psychol 1981, 40:121-137, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.121. · DOI
  9. Krebs DL: Altruism and egoism: a false dichotomy? Psychol Inq 1991, 2:137-139, https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327965pli0202_9. · DOI
  10. Clary EG, Snyder M, Ridge RD, Copeland J, Stukas AA, Haugen J, Miene P: Understanding and assessing the moti- vations of volunteers: a functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998, 74:1516-1530, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.74.6.1516. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Tomasello M: Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 2009.
  12. Murphy RO, Ackermann KA: Social value orientation: theoret- ical and measurement issues in the study of social prefer- ences. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2014, 18:13-41, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1088868313501745. · DOI
  13. West SA, El Mouden C, Gardner A: Sixteen common mis- conceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evol Hum Behav 2011, 32:231-262, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.001. · DOI
  14. Trivers RL: The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 1971, 46:35-57, https://doi.org/10.1086/406755. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Piccinini G, Schulz AW: The ways of altruism. Evol. Psychol. Sci. 2019, 5:58-70, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0167-3. · DOI
  16. Bykov A: Altruism: new perspectives of research on a clas- sical theme in sociology of morality. Curr Sociol 2017, 65: 797-813, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116657861. This paper gives an overview about the term altruism, mainly from a so- cietal perspective. It is outlined where the term "altruism" comes from and how sociologists have applied the term throughout history until today. · DOI
  17. Durkheim E: The division of labor in society. Free Press; 1997.
  18. Bar-Tal D: Altruistic motivation to help: definition, utility and operationalization. Humboldt J Soc Relat 1986, 13:3-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfattheicher, S., Nielsen, Y. A., & Thielmann, I.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
44
Pages
124-129
ISSN
2352-250X
Cited by
374
References
6
Language
en
Funders
Aarhus University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review