Cited by 422LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesGender Roles and Identity Studies

Health disparities between genderqueer, transgender, and cisgender individuals: An extension of minority stress theory

Lefevor, G. Tyler, Boyd-Rogers, Caroline C., Sprague, Brianna M., Janis, Rebecca A.·2019·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

Interpersonal, social, and structural stressors have been identified as key elements that explain health disparities between transgender and cisgender individuals. However, most of this research has focused on binary transgender individuals or has not differentiated between binary and nonbinary individuals; little research has examined the experiences of minority stress or health of those identifying outside the gender binary. Guided by intersectionality and drawing on a sample of 3,568 college students from the Center for Collegiate Mental Health's 2012-2016 database-of whom 892 identified outside the gender binary-we conducted analyses of demographic and outcome measures administered in participants' 1st counseling appointment, examining differences between cisgender, transgender, and genderqueer individuals. We found that genderqueer individuals were harassed, sexually abused, and subjected to traumatic events at higher rates than were either cisgender or binary transgender individuals, with approximately 50% of genderqueer individuals reporting one of these experiences. We found that genderqueer individuals experienced more anxiety, depression, psychological distress, and eating concerns than did binary transgender and cisgender individuals and more social anxiety than did cisgender individuals. Genderqueer individuals more frequently reported self-harm and suicidality than did any other group, with approximately 2/3 of participants' having contemplated and nearly 50% making a suicide attempt. We extend current theorizing about minority stress (Hendricks & Testa, 2012; Meyer, 2003) to include genderqueer individuals and delineate several structural aspects of genderqueer experiences that may be responsible for these trends, including others' lack of knowledge about genderqueer experiences and pronouns, poor access to legal and medical resources, and systemic discrimination. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cou0000339

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lefevor, G. T., Boyd-Rogers, C. C., Sprague, B. M., & Janis, R. A.
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2019-07
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
385-395
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2922712531
Cited by
422
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 7
FWCI
42.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
transgender people, cisgender individuals, minority stress, health disparities, non-binary gender identity, university students, sexual abuse, harassment, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, eating concerns, social anxiety, self-harm, suicidality, intersectionality, institutional discrimination
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Gender Identity, Health Status, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Sex Offenses, Stress, Psychological, Transsexualism, Sexual Harassment, Transgender Persons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review