The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition
Open accessAbstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) uses a magnetic field to “carry” a short lasting electrical current pulse into the brain where it stimulates neurones, particularly in superficial regions of cerebral cortex. TMS can interfere with cognitive functions in two ways. A high intensity TMS pulse causes a synchronised high frequency burst of discharge in a relatively large population of neurones that is terminated by a long lasting GABAergic inhibition. The combination of artificial synchronisation of activity followed by depression effectively disrupts perceptual, motor and cognitive processes in the human brain. This transient neurodisruption has been termed a “virtual lesion”. Smaller intensities of stimulation produce less activity; in such cases, cognitive operations can probably continue but are disrupted because of the added noisy input from the TNS pulse. It is usually argued that if a TMS pulse affects performance, then the area stimulated must provide an essential contribution to behaviour being studied. However, there is one exception to this: the pulse could be applied to an area that is not involved in the task but which has projections to the critical site. Activation of outputs from the site of stimulation could potentially disrupt processing at the distant site, interfering with behaviour without having any involvement in the task. A final important feature of the response to TMS is “context dependency”, which indicates that the response depends on how excitable the cortex is at the time the stimulus is applied: if many neurones are close to firing threshold then the more of them are recruited by the pulse than at rest. Many studies have noted this context-dependent modulation. However, it is often assumed that the excitability of an area has a simple relationship to activity in that area. We argue that this is not necessarily the case. Awareness of the problem may help resolve some apparent anomalies in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
Barker, A. T., Jalinous, R., & Freeston, I. L. (1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4 · Cited by 4,460
Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep
Massimini, M., Ferrarelli, F., Huber, R., Esser, S. K., Singh, H., & Tononi, G. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117256 · Cited by 1,534
Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex.
Ferbert, A., Priori, A., Rothwell, J. C., Day, B. L., Colebatch, J. G., & Marsden, C. D. (1992) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019243 · Cited by 1,486
Self-citationInfluence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke
Murase, N., Duque, J., Mazzocchio, R., & Cohen, L. G. (2004) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10848 · Cited by 1,472
Pascual-Leone, A. (2000) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00081-7 · Cited by 923
Silent period evoked by transcranial stimulation of the human cortex and cervicomedullary junction.
Inghilleri, M., Berardelli, A., Cruccu, G., & Manfredi, M. (1993) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019732 · Cited by 785
Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity
Siebner, H., & Rothwell, J. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1234-2 · Cited by 753
Self-citationRomei, V., Brodbeck, V., Michel, C., Amedi, A., Pascual-Leone, A., & Thut, G. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm229 · Cited by 682
Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols
Ziemann, U., Paulus, W., Nitsche, M. A., Pascual-Leone, A., Byblow, W. D., Berardelli, A., Siebner, H. R., Classen, J., Cohen, L. G., & Rothwell, J. C. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.006 · Cited by 639
Self-citationThe physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans
Di Lazzaro, V, Oliviero, A., Pilato, F., Saturno, E., Dileone, M., Mazzone, P., Insola, A., Tonali, P. A., & Rothwell, J. C. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.009 · Cited by 584
Self-citation
Cited by
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: What We Know and Do Not Know About Mechanisms
Fertonani, A., & Miniussi, C. (2017) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858416631966 · Cited by 470
Pell, G. S., Roth, Y., & Zangen, A. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.003 · Cited by 406
Consensus paper: Combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging
Siebner, H. R., Bergmann, T. O., Bestmann, S., Massimini, M., Johansen-Berg, H., Mochizuki, H., Bohning, D. E., Boorman, E. D., Groppa, S., Miniussi, C., et al. (2009) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.11.002 · Cited by 356
Self-citationPhonological decisions require both the left and right supramarginal gyri
Hartwigsen, G., Baumgaertner, A., Price, C. J., Koehnke, M., Ulmer, S., & Siebner, H. R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008121107 · Cited by 346
Gersner, R., Kravetz, E., Feil, J., Pell, G., & Zangen, A. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6751-10.2011 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Siebner, H. R., Hartwigsen, G., Kassuba, T., & Rothwell, J. C.
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1035-1042
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114936102
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.02.007
- The paper
- Siebner, H. R., Hartwigsen, G., Kassuba, T., & Rothwell, J. C. (2009). How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.02.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.