Cited by 44Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Diffusion MRI properties of the human uncinate fasciculus correlate with the ability to learn visual associations.

Open access
Thomas, Cibu, Avram, Alexandru, Pierpaoli, Carlo, Baker, Chris·2015·Cortex

Abstract

The uncinate fasciculus (UF) is a cortico-cortico white matter pathway that links the anterior temporal and the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). In the monkey, transection of the UF causes significant impairments in learning conditional visual-visual associations, while object discrimination remains intact, suggesting an important role for the UF in mediating the learning of complex visual associations. Whether this functional role extends to the human UF has not been tested directly. Here, we used diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) and behavioral experiments to examine the relation between learning visual associations and the structural properties of the human UF. In a group of healthy adults, we segmented the UF and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) and derived dMRI measures of the structural properties of the two pathways. We also used a behavioral experiment adapted from the monkey studies to characterize the ability of these individuals to learn to associate a person's face with a group of specific scenes (conditional visual-visual association). We then tested whether the variability in the dMRI measures of the two pathways correlated with variability in the ability to rapidly learn the face-place associations. Our study suggests that in the human, the left UF may be important for mediating the rapid learning of conditional visual-visual associations whereas the right UF may play an important role in the immediate retrieval of visual-visual associatio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.01.023

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, C., Avram, A., Pierpaoli, C., & Baker, C.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Cibu
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
72
Pages
65-78
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119036816
Cited by
44
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cortex (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NICHD
  • NIMH (MH002909-07)
  • Department of Defense
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
uncinate fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, white matter microstructure, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior temporal cortex, functional neuroanatomy, diffusion tensor imaging, hemispheric lateralization
MeSH terms
Adult, Association Learning, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways, Visual Perception, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review