Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 970

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability

Open access
Mauser, Wolfram, Klepper, Gernot, Rice, Martin, Schmalzbauer, Bettina Susanne, Hackmann, Heide, Leemans, Rik, Moore, Howard·2013·Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Abstract

The challenges formulated within the Future Earth framework set the orientation for research programmes in sustainability science for the next ten years. Scientific disciplines from natural and social science will collaborate both among each other and with relevant societal groups in order to define the important integrated research questions, and to explore together successful pathways towards global sustainability. Such collaboration will be based on transdisciplinarity and integrated research concepts. This paper analyses the relationship between scientific integration and transdisciplinarity, discusses the dimensions of integration of different knowledge and proposes a platform and a paradigm for research towards global sustainability that will be both designed and conducted in partnership between science and society. We argue that integration is an iterative process that involves reflection among all stakeholders. It consists of three stages: co-design, co-production and co-dissemination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Reid, 2010, Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges, Science, 330, 916, 10.1126/science.1196263 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Szostak, 2007, How and why to teach interdisciplinary research practice, J Res Pract, 3, M17
  3. Klein, 2008, Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review, Am J Prev Med, 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Palmer, 1996, Disturbance and patch-specific responses: the interactive effects of woody debris and floods on lotic invertebrates, Oecologia, 105, 247, 10.1007/BF00328554 · doi:10.1007/bf00328554
  5. Hirsch Hadorn, 2006, Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research, Ecol Econ, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Defries, 2012, Planetary opportunities: a social contract for global change science to contribute to a sustainable future, BioScience, 10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.11 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Antonacopoulou, 2009, Impact and scholarship: unlearning and practicing to co-create actionable knowledge, Manage Learn, 40, 421, 10.1177/1350507609336708 · DOI
  8. Etzkowitz, 1983, Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American Academic Science, Minerva, 21, 198, 10.1007/BF01097964 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Lovelock, 1974, Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the Gaia Hypothesis, Tellus XXVI, 1
  10. Schellnhuber, 1999, Earth system analysis and the second Copernican revolution, Nature, 402, C19, 10.1038/35011515 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Noone, 2006, Earth system science: putting together the ‘big picture’ puzzle, J Phys IV, 139, 1
  12. Leemans, 2009, Developing a common strategy for integrated global change research and outreach: the Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP), Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 1, 4, 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.07.013 · DOI
  13. Tabara, 2012, Coupling human information and knowledge systems with social–ecological systems change: reframing research, education, and policy for sustainability, Environ Sci Policy
  14. Tress, 2004, Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology, Landsc Ecol
  15. Stokols, 2008, The ecology of team science—understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration, Am J Prev Med
  16. Wagner, 2011, Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature, J Inform, 10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mittelstrass, 2011, On transdisciplinarity, TRAMES, 10.3176/tr.2011.4.01 · DOI
  18. Pahl-Wostl, 2012, Transition towards a new global change science: requirements for methodologies, methods, data and knowledge, Environ Sci Policy
  19. Redclift, 1998, Dances with wolves? Interdisciplinary research on the global environment, Global Environ Change, 8, 177, 10.1016/S0959-3780(98)00020-X · doi:10.1016/s0959-3780(98)00020-x
  20. Kinzig, 2001, Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges, Ecosystems, 10.1007/s10021-001-0039-7 · DOI
  21. Sherren, 2009, Collaborative research on sustainability: myths and conundrums of interdisciplinary departments, J Res Pract Inform Technol, 5, 1
  22. Haapasaari, 2012, Growing into interdisciplinarity: how to converge biology, economics, and social science in fisheries research?, Ecol Soc, 10.5751/ES-04503-170106 · DOI
  23. Lang, 2012, Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—practice, principles, and challenges, Sustain Sci, 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x · DOI · Paper page
  24. Costanza, 2003, A vision of the future of science: reintegrating the study of humans and the rest of nature, Futures, 35, 651, 10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00105-2 · doi:10.1016/s0016-3287(02)00105-2
  25. Max-Neef, 2005, Foundations of transdisciplinarity, Ecol Econ, 53, 5, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Wickson, 2006, Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality, Futures, 38, 1046, 10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.011 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Fortuin, 2011, The value of conceptual models in coping with complexity and interdisciplinarity in environmental sciences education, BioScience, 61, 802, 10.1525/bio.2011.61.10.10 · DOI
  28. Schlosser, 2012, Earth science for sustainability, Nat Geosci, 5, 587, 10.1038/ngeo1567 · doi:10.1038/ngeo1567
  29. Barthel, 2008, An integrated modelling framework for simulating regional-scale actor responses to global change in the water domain, Environ Model Softw, 23, 1095, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.02.004 · DOI
  30. Soboll, 2010, Integrated regional modelling and scenario development to evaluate future water demand under global change conditions, Mitig Adapt Strat Global Change
  31. Grunwald, 2007, Working towards sustainable development in the face of uncertainty and incomplete knowledge, J Environ Policy Plan, 9, 245, 10.1080/15239080701622774 · DOI
  32. Grunwald, 2011, Sustainability assessment of energy technologies: towards an integrative framework, Energy Sustain Soc, 10.1186/2192-0567-1-3 · doi:10.1186/2192-0567-1-3
  33. Ignaciuk, 2012, Responding to complex societal challenges: a decade of Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP) interdisciplinary research, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 4, 147, 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.12.003 · DOI
  34. Alcamo, 1996, Global models meet global policy—how can global and regional modellers connect with environmental policy makers? What has hindered them? What has helped?, Global Environ Change, 6, 255, 10.1016/S0959-3780(96)00031-3 · doi:10.1016/s0959-3780(96)00031-3

Cited by

See all 970

Metadata

Authors
Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R., & Moore, H.
Venue
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
5
Issue
3-4
Pages
420-431
ISSN
1877-3435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998555281
Cited by
970
References
1
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation, DFG)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001
The paper
Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R., & Moore, H. (2013). Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.