Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engineering virus resistance via CRISPR–Cas systems

Mahas, Ahmed, Mahfouz, Magdy·2018·Current Opinion in Virology

Abstract

In prokaryotes, CRISPR/Cas adaptive immunity systems target and destroy nucleic acids derived from invading bacteriophages and other foreign genetic elements. In eukaryotes, the native function of these systems has been exploited to combat viruses in mammals and plants. Rewired CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cas13 systems have been used to confer resistance against DNA and RNA viruses, respectively. Here, we discuss recent approaches employing CRISPR/Cas systems to combat viruses in eukaryotes, highlight key challenges, and provide future perspectives. Moreover, we discuss the application of CRISPR/Cas systems in genome-wide screens to identify key host factors for virus infection to enhance our understanding of basic virus biology and to identify and study virus-host interactions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coviro.2018.06.002

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Metadata

Authors
Mahas, A., & Mahfouz, M.
Venue
Current Opinion in Virology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
32
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1879-6257
Cited by
74
References
61
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering virus resistance via CRISPR–Cas systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.coviro.2018.06.002
The paper
Mahas, A., & Mahfouz, M. (2018). Engineering virus resistance via CRISPR–Cas systems. Current Opinion in Virology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2018.06.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.