Cited by 38Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Gating Approaches in Cardiac PET Imaging

Open access
Lassen, Martin Lyngby, Kwiecinski, Jacek, Slomka, Piotr J.·2019·PET Clinics

Abstract

Cardiac PET provides high sensitivity and high negative predictive value in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and cardiomyopathies. Cardiac, respiratory as well as bulk patient motion have detrimental effects on thoracic PET imaging, in particular on cardiovascular PET imaging where the motion can affect the PET images quantitatively as well as qualitatively. Gating can ameliorate the unfavorable impact of motion additionally enabling evaluation of left ventricular systolic function. In this article, the authors review the recent advances in gating approaches and highlight the advances in data-driven approaches, which hold promise in motion detection without the need for complex hardware setup.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.12.008

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In cardiac PET imaging, contraction of the myocardium contributes to quantitative inaccuracy of uncorrected static PET protocols.

    “In cardiac PET imaging, contraction of the myocardium further contributes to the quantitative inaccuracy of uncorrected static PET protocols [90,91].”

    From Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation (2022) · cites this paper as [90]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [62]Munoz C, Neji R, Cruz G, Motion-corrected simultaneous cardiac positron emission tomography and coronary MR angiography with high acquisition efficiency. Magn Reson Med. 2018; 79(1): 339– 350. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26690 28426162 PMC5763353 · DOI
  2. [69]Chesler DA. 3-Dimensional activity distribution from multiple positron scintigraphs. In: Journal of Nuclear Medicine. Vol 12; 1971: 347.
  3. [74]Martinez-Möller A, Souvatzoglou M, Navab N, Schwaiger M, Nekolla SG. Artifacts from Misaligned CT in Cardiac Perfusion Solutions. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(2): 188– 194. 17268013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lassen, M. L., Kwiecinski, J., & Slomka, P. J.
Affiliations
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Slomka, Piotr J.
Venue
PET Clinics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
271-279
ISSN
1556-8598 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913989203
Cited by
38
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PET Clinics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL135557)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cardiac PET, gating, respiratory motion, cardiac motion, motion correction, left ventricular systolic function, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathy
MeSH terms
Electrocardiography, Humans, Cardiomyopathies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Positron-Emission Tomography, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques, Respiratory-Gated Imaging Techniques, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review