The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis
Abstract
The benefits of cognitive-behavioral treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have been evidenced by several meta-analyses. However, the differential effectiveness of behavioral and cognitive approaches has shown inconclusive results. In this paper a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for OCD is presented by applying random- and mixed-effects models. The literature search enabled us to identify 19 studies published between 1980 and 2006 that fulfilled our selection criteria, giving a total of 24 independent comparisons between a treated and a control group. The effect size index was the standardized mean difference in the posttest. The effect estimates for exposure with response prevention (ERP) alone (d(+)=1.127), cognitive restructuring (CR) alone (d(+)=1.090), and ERP plus CR (d(+)=0.998) were very similar, although the effect estimate for CR alone was based on only three comparisons. Therapist-guided exposure was better than therapist-assisted self-exposure, and exposure in vivo combined with exposure in imagination was better than exposure in vivo alone. The relationships of subject, methodological and extrinsic variables with effect size were also examined, and an analysis of publication bias was carried out. Finally, the implications of the results for clinical practice and for future research in this field were discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To target these cognitive biases, “cognitive therapy” was developed (Rosa‐Alcázar et al., 2008). Cognitive therapy typically involves teaching patients about the implausibility and maladaptive nature of these cognitions”
From Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Etiology, neuropathology, and cognitive dysfunction (2023) · cites this paper as Rosa‐Alcázar et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“A recent study by Steketee, Siev, Yovel, Lit, and Wilhelm [32] as well as two meta-analyses showed that CT and ERP both reduced OC symptoms to a similar extent [33, 34].”
From Metacognitive Training for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“These studies demonstrate that large effect sizes, which were comparable to those obtained in face-to-face therapy [47, 48], can be obtained with minimal therapist contact, although follow-up periods have been relatively shorter than in other outcome studies for OCD that usually report 6-to-12 month follow-up data.”
From Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“Obsessive-compulsive disorder can be treated successfully with cognitive behavioural treatment (CBT), particularly exposure with response prevention [3], [4], [5], [6].”
From The acceptability of internet-based treatment and characteristics of an adult sample with obsessive compulsive disorder: An internet survey (2011) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“One meta-analysis found that exposure in vivo combined with imaginal exposure was better than exposure in vivo alone [60].”
From Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders (2014) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Meta-analyses support the beneficial effects of psychological treatment for OCD, mainly CBT, generally including exposure with response prevention (ERP) [60-63,70,71, 655-657].”
From Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders (2014) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Several meta-analyses have demonstrated no significant differences in efficacy between group and individual CBT [60,62,663].”
From Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders (2014) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Results with CBT were generally similar in comparisons of interventions with an emphasis on ERP and those with an emphasis on cognitive elements [60,63,655].”
From Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders (2014) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Data suggest that therapist-guided exposure is better than self-exposure [60].”
From Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders (2014) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Rosa-Alcázar, Sánchez-Meca, Gómez-Conesa, and Marín-Martínez (2008) demonstrated that both cognitive restructuring (CR) and ERP alone, and in combination, are effective in the treatment of OCD [9].”
From Low intensity technology-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Cognitive Therapy for Depression
(2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e675542012-001 · Cited by 9,678
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
(1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,899
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: I. Development, Use, and Reliability
Goodman, W. K. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007 · Cited by 7,712
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?
Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.193 · Cited by 4,256
Self-citationFixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sánchez-Meca, 2003, El tratamiento psicológico del trastorno obsesivo–compulsivo en Europa: Un estudio meta-analítico [The psychological treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder in Europe: A meta-analytic study.], Psicología Conductual, 11, 213
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes
Van den Noortgate, W., López-López, J. A., Marín-Martínez, F., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2013) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0261-6 · Cited by 1,130
Self-citationKatzman, M. A., Bleau, P., Blier, P., Chokka, P., Kjernisted, K., Van Ameringen, M., & the Canadian Anxiety Guidelines Initiative Group on behalf of the Anxiety Disorders Association of Canada/Association Canadienne des troubles anxieux and McGill University (2014) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-14-s1-s1 · Cited by 1,090
“Results with CBT were generally similar in comparisons of interventions with an emphasis on ERP and those with an emphasis on cognitive elements [60,63,655].”
BackgroundInfluentialBaldwin, D. S., Anderson, I. M., Nutt, D. J., Allgulander, C., Bandelow, B., den Boer, J. A., Christmas, D. M., Davies, S., Fineberg, N., Lidbetter, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881114525674 · Cited by 676
Olatunji, B. O., Davis, M. L., Powers, M. B., & Smits, J. A. J. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.08.020 · Cited by 659
Öst, L.-G., Havnen, A., Hansen, B., & Kvale, G. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.003 · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosa-Alcázar, A. I., Sánchez-Meca, J., Gómez-Conesa, A., & Marín-Martínez, F.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1310-1325
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984403880
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, psychological intervention, exposure and response prevention, cognitive restructuring, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavior therapy, in vivo exposure, treatment effectiveness, publication bias
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Behavior Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Publication Bias, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
