Cited by 3SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchEvolution and Genetic Dynamicsvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Dynamic expedition of leading mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins

Open access
Hasan, Muhammad, He, Zhouyi, Jia, Mengqi, Leung, Alvin C.F., Natarajan, Kathiresan, Xu, Wentao, Yap, Shanqi, Zhou, Feng +4 more·2024·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The continuous evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which caused the recent pandemic, has generated countless new variants with varying fitness. Mutations of the spike glycoprotein play a particularly vital role in shaping its evolutionary trajectory, as they have the capability to alter its infectivity and antigenicity. We present a time-resolved statistical method, Dynamic Expedition of Leading Mutations (deLemus), to analyze the evolutionary dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. The proposed L -index of the deLemus method is effective in quantifying the mutation strength of each amino acid site and outlining evolutionarily significant sites, allowing the comprehensive characterization of the evolutionary mutation pattern of the spike glycoprotein.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.05.037

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hasan, M., He, Z., Jia, M., Leung, A. C. F., Natarajan, K., Xu, W., Yap, S., Zhou, F., Chen, S., Su, H., Zhu, K., & Su, H.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Su, Hailei
  • Zhu, Kaicheng
  • Su, Haibin
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2024-05-30
Volume
23
Pages
2407-2417
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4398765285
Cited by
3
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (R9418)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, spike protein, viral evolution, L-index, viral variants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review