Cited by 13Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bridging prediction and reality: Comprehensive analysis of experimental and AlphaFold 2 full-length nuclear receptor structures

Open access
Mazhibiyeva, Akerke, Pham, Tri T., Pats, Karina, Lukac, Martin, Molnár, Ferdinand·2025·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

AlphaFold 2 has revolutionized protein structure prediction, yet systematic evaluations of its performance against experimental structures for specific protein families remain limited. Here we present the first comprehensive analysis comparing AlphaFold 2-predicted and experimental nuclear receptor structures, examining root-mean-square deviations, secondary structure elements, domain organization, and ligand-binding pocket geometry. While AlphaFold2 achieves high accuracy in predicting stable conformations with proper stereochemistry, it shows limitations in capturing the full spectrum of biologically relevant states, particularly in flexible regions and ligand-binding pockets. Statistical analysis reveals significant domain-specific variations, with ligand-binding domains showing higher structural variability (CV = 29.3%) compared to DNA-binding domains (CV = 17.7%). Notably, Alphafold 2 systematically underestimates ligand-binding pocket volumes and captures only single conformational states in homodimeric receptors where experimental structures show functionally important asymmetry. These findings provide critical insights for structure-based drug design targeting nuclear receptors and establish a framework for evaluating Alphafold 2 predictions across other protein families.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.05.010

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/978-3-030-52321-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/jacsau.3c00188 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41467-017-00981-y · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.07.001 · DOI
  6. 10.1107/S0907444909042073 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b02057 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1074/jbc.C200420200 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.str.2022.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/bioadv/vbae187 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41401-022-00938-y · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41592-022-01685-y · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1073/pnas.2221745120 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/1472-6807-8-49 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104496 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts345 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00467 · DOI
  19. 10.1124/mol.112.079285 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/ncomms9013 · DOI
  21. 10.1124/mol.119.116806 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nsmb.2778 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9585-1_4 · DOI
  24. 10.1126/scisignal.2002515 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41598-024-60220-7 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41594-022-00914-4 · DOI
  27. 10.1074/jbc.M109.026682 · DOI
  28. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00222 · DOI
  29. 10.1530/JME-13-0173 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac202 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(199603)38:3%3C305::AID-BIP4%E3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nrd.2016.230 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.3389/fendo.2017.00016 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.str.2022.08.004 · DOI
  35. 10.3390/biom12070985 · DOI
  36. Team C.D.: Chai-1: decoding the molecular interactions of life. 2024. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.10.615955. · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1021/jm500442z · DOI
  38. 10.3390/membranes12020229 · DOI
  39. 10.1210/me.2010-0083 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1002/prot.22613 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/07391102.2018.1559099 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1073/pnas.2206737119 · DOI
  46. Zhorov B.S. and Dong K.: Pyrethroids in an alphafold2 model of the insect sodium channel. Insects 2022; 1310.3390/insects13080745. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/13/8/745. · DOI
  47. 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1083575 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Mazhibiyeva, A., Pham, T. T., Pats, K., Lukac, M., & Molnár, F.
Affiliations
  • Nazarbayev University (KZ)
  • ITMO University (RU)
  • Department of Computer Networks and Engineering, Hiroshima City University, 3-4-1 Oozukahigashi, Asaminami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, 731–3166, Japan
Corresponding author
Molnár, Ferdinand
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2025-01-01
Volume
27
Pages
1998-2013
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410398694
Cited by
13
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nazarbayev University Repository (Nazarbayev University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Nazarbayev University (091019CRP2108)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
AlphaFold2, nuclear receptors, protein structure prediction, forecast evaluation, binding pocket, DNA-binding domain, conformational heterogeneity, structure-based drug design, full-length protein structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review