Cited by 104Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications

The accuracy of protein structures in solution determined by AlphaFold and NMR

Open access
Fowler, Nicholas J., Williamson, Mike P.·2022·Structure

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In the recent Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) competition, AlphaFold2 performed outstandingly. Its worst predictions were for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structures, which has two alternative explanations: either the NMR structures were poor, implying that Alpha-Fold may be more accurate than NMR, or there is a genuine difference between crystal and solution structures. Here, we use the program Accuracy of NMR Structures Using RCI and Rigidity (ANSURR), which measures the accuracy of solution structures, and show that one of the NMR structures was indeed poor. We then compare Alpha-Fold predictions to NMR structures and show that Alpha-Fold tends to be more accurate than NMR ensembles. There are, however, some cases where the NMR ensembles are more accurate. These tend to be dynamic structures, where Alpha-Fold had low confidence. We suggest that Alpha-Fold could be used as the model for NMR-structure refinements and that Alpha-Fold structures validated by ANSURR may require no further refinement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.str.2022.04.005

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fowler, N. J., & Williamson, M. P.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Fowler, Nicholas J.
Venue
Structure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
925-933.e2
ISSN
0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229373389
Cited by
104
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 12
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Structure (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P020038/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, solution structure, NMR ensembles, CASP, protein dynamics, NMR structure refinement
MeSH terms
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review