The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling: A review
Open accessAbstract
It is difficult to reuse wastes from polymers due to the mismatch between the amount of contaminants and the secondary polymers and the quality of the feed. This type of operation is much more expensive and cost-effective than the production of polymer raw materials from the latest materials. However, the reuse of recyclable polymers is beneficial if used extensively in the production of various concrete products and wood-polymer boards. This is done only if cleaning and sorting are not particularly important for the production of polymer products. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is a widely used polymer in various industries due to its excellent physical and chemical properties. Besides, the increasing use of PET products has led to a global crisis in waste management, as improper disposal of products has caused significant environmental damage. PET is a major source of accumulated waste in landfills, and to address this issue, recycling methods have evolved. In this regard, the present review examines various techniques involved in the recycling of PET. Conventional recycling methods and the influence of diverse depolymerization reaction variables were discussed, and the upsides and downsides of each technique were considered. The review summarizes major advances in recycling technologies for plastic waste, focusing on the bio-recycling of PET, aiming for sustainable, economical solutions in the circular economy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, R., & Law, K. L. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1260352 · Cited by 13,163
Plastics Recycling: Challenges and Opportunities
Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R., & Kosior, E. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0311 · Cited by 3,201
Applications and societal benefits of plastics
Andrady, A. L., & Neal, M. A. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0304 · Cited by 2,464
An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles
Tournier, V., Topham, C. M., Gilles, A., David, B., Folgoas, C., Moya-Leclair, E., Kamionka, E., Desrousseaux, M.-L., Texier, H., Gavalda, S., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2149-4 · Cited by 2,176
Beyond Mechanical Recycling: Giving New Life to Plastic Waste
Vollmer, I., Jenks, M. J. F., Roelands, M. C. P., White, R. J., van Harmelen, T., de Wild, P., van der Laan, G. P., Meirer, F., Keurentjes, J. T. F., & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201915651 · Cited by 1,905
Mechanical Recycling of Packaging Plastics: A Review
Schyns, Z. O. G., & Shaver, M. P. (2021) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.202000415 · Cited by 1,643
Critical advances and future opportunities in upcycling commodity polymers
Jehanno, C., Alty, J. W., Roosen, M., De Meester, S., Dove, A. P., Chen, E. Y.-X., Leibfarth, F. A., & Sardon, H. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04350-0 · Cited by 1,325
Recent advances in biodegradable polymers for sustainable applications
Samir, A., Ashour, F. H., Hakim, A. A. A., & Bassyouni, M. (2022) · npj Materials Degradation · doi:10.1038/s41529-022-00277-7 · Cited by 1,209
Mechanical recycling of waste electric and electronic equipment: a review
Cui, J., & Forssberg, E. (2003) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/s0304-3894(03)00061-x · Cited by 1,096
Plastic Waste: Challenges and Opportunities to Mitigate Pollution and Effective Management
Kibria, M. G., Masuk, N. I., Safayet, R., Nguyen, H. Q., & Mourshed, M. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research · doi:10.1007/s41742-023-00507-z · Cited by 884
Cited by
Sustainable Solutions Through Innovative Plastic Waste Recycling Technologies
Alaghemandi, M. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su162310401 · Cited by 163
Porous carbon derived from waste plastics for energy and environmental application: A review
Hou, Q., Zhang, Y., & Wang, C. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2025.115368 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Muringayil Joseph, T., Azat, S., Ahmadi, Z., Moini Jazani, O., Esmaeili, A., Kianfar, E., Haponiuk, J., & Thomas, S.
- Venue
- Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 100673
- ISSN
- 2666-0164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392103533
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 131
- FWCI
- 37.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100673
- The paper
- Muringayil Joseph, T., Azat, S., Ahmadi, Z., Moini Jazani, O., Esmaeili, A., Kianfar, E., Haponiuk, J., & Thomas, S. (2024). Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling: A review. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100673
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
