The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agile Requirements Engineering: A systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Nowadays, Agile Software Development (ASD) is used to cope with increasing complexity in system development. Hybrid development models, with the integration of User-Centered Design (UCD), are applied with the aim to deliver competitive products with a suitable User Experience (UX). Therefore, stakeholder and user involvement during Requirements Engineering (RE) are essential in order to establish a collaborative environment with constant feedback loops. The aim of this study is to capture the current state of the art of the literature related to Agile RE with focus on stakeholder and user involvement. In particular, we investigate what approaches exist to involve stakeholder in the process, which methodologies are commonly used to present the user perspective and how requirements management is been carried out. We conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with an extensive quality assessment of the included studies. We identified 27 relevant papers. After analyzing them in detail, we derive deep insights to the following aspects of Agile RE: stakeholder and user involvement, data gathering, user perspective, integrated methodologies, shared understanding, artifacts, documentation and Non-Functional Requirements (NFR). Agile RE is a complex research field with cross-functional influences. This study will contribute to the software development body of knowledge by assessing the involvement of stakeholder and user in Agile RE, providing methodologies that make ASD more human-centric and giving an overview of requirements management in ASD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change
Beck, K. L., & Andres, C. (2000) · Cited by 5,902
Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems
Beyer, H. R., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997) · Cited by 2,748
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,668
The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction
Kruchten, P. B. (1998) · Cited by 2,592
The new new product development game
(1986) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1016/0737-6782(86)90053-6 · Cited by 1,573
Requirements Engineering: A Good Practice Guide
Sommerville, I., & Sawyer, P. (1997) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 1,204
Agile Project Management with Scrum
Schwaber, K. (1980) · Cited by 1,124
User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development
Cohn, M. (2004) · Cited by 1,092
Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation
Humble, J., & Farley, D. R. (2010) · Cited by 911
Schwaber, K. (1997) · Business Object Design and Implementation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0947-1_11 · Cited by 868
Cited by
Aichner, T., Grünfelder, M., Maurer, O., & Jegeni, D. (2021) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0134 · Cited by 538
Requirements engineering: A systematic mapping study in agile software development
Curcio, K., Navarro, T., Malucelli, A., & Reinehr, S. (2018) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.036 · Cited by 169
Human Values in Software Engineering: Contrasting Case Studies of Practice
Hussain, W., Perera, H., Whittle, J., Nurwidyantoro, A., Hoda, R., Shams, R. A., & Oliver, G. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2020.3038802 · Cited by 59
A mapping study on documentation in Continuous Software Development
Theunissen, T., van Heesch, U., & Avgeriou, P. (2022) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106733 · Cited by 40
A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering
Madampe, K., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3253145 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Schön, E.-M., Thomaschewski, J., & Escalona, M. J.
- Venue
- Computer Standards & Interfaces
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 49
- Pages
- 79-91
- ISSN
- 0920-5489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2515624622
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 12.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agile Requirements Engineering: A systematic literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.csi.2016.08.011
- The paper
- Schön, E.-M., Thomaschewski, J., & Escalona, M. J. (2017). Agile Requirements Engineering: A systematic literature review. Computer Standards & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.08.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.