Cited by 254Speech and dialogue systemsSpeech Recognition and SynthesisLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue

Open access
Gravano, Agustín, Hirschberg, Julia·2011·Computer Speech & Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csl.2010.10.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In English conversations, backchannels were often preceded by rising pitch and higher intensity.

    “Gravano and Hirschberg (2011) investigated English conversations and found that backchannels were often preceded by rising pitch and higher intensity.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Gravano and Hirschberg, 2011

  • The likelihood of a backchannel happening increases quadratically with the number of cues that a speaker displays at any moment.

    “This work analyses speakers' intonation, intensity, pitch, IPU duration, voice quality, as well as part-of-speech bigrams and shows that the likelihood of a backchannel happening increases quadratically with the number of cues that a speaker displays at any moment.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Gravano and Hirschberg, 2011

  • Speakers differ in the way they use backchannel-inviting cues.

    “Gravano and Hirschberg (2011) also show that speakers differ in the way they use cues.”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Gravano and Hirschberg, 2011

  • In conversational speech, speakers use cues to ends of turns quite inconsistently.

    “However, in conversational speech, speakers use such cues quite inconsistently”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Gravano & Hirschberg, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Computer Speech & Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
601-634
ISSN
0885-2308 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008741806
Cited by
254
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer Speech & Language (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0307905, 0803148)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
turn-taking, task-oriented dialogue, interactive voice response, backchannels, prosodic cues, overlapping speech

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review