Cited by 17Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesPhonetics and Phonology ResearchLinguistic Studies and Language Acquisition

Speakers advance-project turn completion by slowing down: A multifactorial corpus analysis

Rühlemann, Christoph, Gries, Stefan Th.·2020·Journal of Phonetics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100976

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Linguistic analyses have shown that there are many cues that can foreshadow the ends of turns, including tag questions, phonetic cues such as pitch drops and turn-final lengthening of words, and gestural cues.

    “Linguistic analyses have shown that there are many cues that can foreshadow the ends of turns (for a useful listening, see Rühlemann & Gries, 2020). These cues include, for instance, tag questions, such as “Isn’t it?”, phonetic cues, such as pitch drops and turn-final lengthening of words, and gestural cues.”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Rühlemann & Gries, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rühlemann, C., & Gries, S. T.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Rühlemann, Christoph
Venue
Journal of Phonetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
80
Pages
100976
ISSN
0095-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3020375457
Cited by
17
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
10.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Phonetics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Philipps-Universität Marburg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
Keywords
turn transitions, word duration, talk-in-interaction, turn duration, mixed models, conversational turn-taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review