Cited by 211Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesPhonetics and Phonology ResearchSpeech and dialogue systems

Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction

Open access
Bögels, Sara, Torreira, Francisco·2015·Journal of Phonetics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.004

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Listeners can rapidly infer the speech act of utterances.

    “there are studies showing specifically that listeners can rapidly infer the speech act of utterances”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Bögels & Torreira, 2015

    The Introduction and General discussion examine how listeners project turn ends and time their responses. They do not establish that listeners rapidly infer an utterance’s speech act (searched: “speech act,” question versus statement, and pragmatic action). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening. The MIT Press.
  2. Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. D'Urso, & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11-38). Padua, Italy: Cleup Editore.
  3. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Liberman, Mark, & Pierrehumbert, Janet (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aronoff, & R. Oehrle (Eds.), Language sound structure. MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bögels, S., & Torreira, F.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Torreira, Francisco
Venue
Journal of Phonetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
52
Pages
46-57
ISSN
0095-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W316215934
Cited by
211
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
71.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Phonetics (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ERC Advanced (269484 INTERACT)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
turn-taking, intonational phrase boundaries, intonation, spoken interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review