Cited by 11Phonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeuroscience and Music Perception

How do listeners time response articulation when answering questions? The role of speech rate.

Open access
Corps, Ruth E., Gambi, Chiara, Pickering, Martin J.·2020·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

?) of questions using time-compression, so that each component was spoken at the natural rate or twice as a fast. Listeners responded earlier when the context was speeded rather than natural, suggesting they used the speaker's context rate to time answer articulation. Additionally, listeners responded earlier when the speaker's final syllable was speeded than natural, regardless of context rate, suggesting they adjusted the timing of articulation after listening to a single syllable produced at a different rate. We replicated this final word effect in Experiment 2, which also showed that our speech rate manipulation did not influence the timing of response preparation. Together, these findings suggest listeners use speech rate information to time articulation when answering questions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/xlm0000759

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Corps, Gambi, and Pickering (2020) showed that participants in a laboratory study used both the global speech rate of yes/no questions they had to answer and the duration of the final word of the question to predict the end of the question and time their answer accordingly.

    “Corps, Gambi, and Pickering (2020) showed that participants in a laboratory study used both the global speech rate of yes/no questions they had to answer and the duration of the final word of the question to predict the end of the question and time their answer accordingly.”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Corps, Gambi, and Pickering, 2020

  • Listeners predict ends of turns and launch prepared responses in anticipation rather than in response to them.

    “The second claim is that listeners predict ends of turns and launch prepared responses in anticipation rather than in response to them.”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Corps, Gambi, and Pickering, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corps, R. E., Gambi, C., & Pickering, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Corps, Ruth E.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
2020-04
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
781-802
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2968482590
Cited by
10
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/J500136/1)
  • Leverhulme (RPG-2014-523)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
speech rate, question answering, speech perception, time compression, response preparation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Psycholinguistics, Speech, Speech Perception, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review