Cited by 153Tryptophan and brain disordersStress Responses and CortisolVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Conceptual development of the immune system as a sixth sense

Blalock, J. Edwin, Smith, Eric M.·2007·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Understanding how and why the immune and nervous systems communicate in a bidirectional pathway has been fundamental to the development of the psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) field. This review will discuss some of the pivotal results that found the nervous and immune systems use a common chemical language for intra and inter-system communication. Specifically the nervous and immune systems produce a common set of peptide and nonpeptide neurotransmitters and cytokines that provides a common repertoire of receptors and ligands between the two systems. These studies led to the concept that through the sharing of ligands and receptors the immune system could serve as a sixth sense to detect things the body cannot otherwise hear, see, smell, taste or touch. Pathogens, tumors, and allergens are detected with great sensitivity and specificity by the immune system. As a sixth sense the immune system is a means to signal and mobilize the body to respond to these types of challenges. The paper will also review in a chronological manner some of the PNI-related studies important to validating the sixth sense concept. Finally, the review will suggest ways to apply the new found knowledge of the sixth sense to understanding a placebo effect and developing new therapeutic approaches for treatment of human diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2006.09.004

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent systematic review reported an increase in transforming growth factor-β as the most consistent cytokine finding across ME/CFS studies.

    “a recent systematic review reported an increase in transforming growth factor (TGF)-β as the most consistent finding across studies (59).”

    From The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [59]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blalock, J. E., & Smith, E. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Eric M.
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
23-33
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038803905
Cited by
153
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL077783, HL077783, R01HL068806, HL-68806)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS41495, R01NS041495)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
psychoneuroimmunology, neurotransmitters, cytokines, peptide neurotransmitters, placebo effect, treatment options
MeSH terms
Animals, Forecasting, Humans, Neuroendocrinology, Neurosecretory Systems, Psychoneuroimmunology, Research Design, Neuroimmunomodulation, Signal Transduction, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review