Cited by 228Cancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Mind-Body Treatments for the Pain-Fatigue-Sleep Disturbance Symptom Cluster in Persons with Cancer

Open access
Kwekkeboom, Kristine L., Cherwin, Catherine H., Lee, Jun W., Wanta, Britt·2010·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Co-occurring pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance comprise a common symptom cluster in patients with cancer. Treatment approaches that target the cluster of symptoms rather than just a single symptom need to be identified and tested.Objectives To synthesize evidence regarding mind-body interventions that have shown efficacy in treating two or more symptoms in the pain-fatigue-sleep disturbance cancer symptom cluster.Methods A literature search was conducted using CINAHL, Medline, and PsychInfo databases through March 2009. Studies were categorized based on the type of mind-body intervention (relaxation, imagery/hypnosis, cognitive-behavioral therapy/coping skills training [CBT/CST], meditation, music, and virtual reality), and a preliminary review was conducted with respect to efficacy for pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance. Mind-body interventions were selected for review if there was evidence of efficacy for at least two of the three symptoms. Forty-three studies addressing five types of mind-body interventions met criteria and are summarized in this review.Results Imagery/hypnosis and CBT/CST interventions have produced improvement in all the three cancer-related symptoms individually: pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance. Relaxation has resulted in improvements in pain and sleep disturbance. Meditation interventions have demonstrated beneficial effects on fatigue and sleep disturbance. Music interventions have demonstrated efficacy for pain and fatigue. No trials were found that tested the mind-body interventions specifically for the pain-fatigue-sleep disturbance symptom cluster.Conclusion Efficacy studies are needed to test the impact of relaxation, imagery/hypnosis, CBT/CST, meditation, and music interventions in persons with cancer experiencing concurrent pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance. These mind-body interventions could help patients manage all the symptoms in the cluster with a single treatment strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.022

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analysis confirms that psychological interventions such as CBT reduce physical symptoms across the cancer continuum into survivorship.

    “Meta-analysis confirms that psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are effective in reducing physical symptoms across the cancer continuum into survivorship [15].”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and conceptual model (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that CBT/CST was efficacious in 14 of 21 studies, and that reviewed patients included people receiving treatment and people who had completed it. But the Method describes a systematic narrative review, not a meta-analysis; the Discussion says the authors did not calculate effect sizes. The Conclusions say these interventions hold promise, rather than confirming effectiveness across the cancer continuum. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 106 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [83]Chlan L Snyder M Lindquist R Music therapy Complementary / Alternative Therapies in Nursing 1998 3rd ed. New York Springer Publishing 243 257

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwekkeboom, K. L., Cherwin, C. H., Lee, J. W., & Wanta, B.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Kwekkeboom, Kristine L.
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
126-138
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971153042
Cited by
228
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (P20NR008987)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
mind-body interventions, cancer pain, cancer-related fatigue, sleep disorders, symptom clusters, cognitive behavioral therapy, coping skills training, relaxation, meditation, music therapy, virtual reality, symptom management
MeSH terms
Fatigue, Humans, Neoplasms, Pain, Sleep Wake Disorders, Mind-Body Therapies, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review