Cited by 70Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Timing of Single-Neuron and Local Field Potential Responses in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe

Open access
Rey, Hernan Gonzalo, Fried, Itzhak, Quian Quiroga, Rodrigo·2014·Current Biology

Abstract

The relationship between the firing of single cells and local field potentials (LFPs) has received increasing attention, with studies in animals [1-11] and humans [12-14]. Recordings in the human medial temporal lobe (MTL) have demonstrated the existence of neurons with selective and invariant responses [15], with a relatively late but precise response onset around 300 ms after stimulus presentation [16-18] and firing only upon conscious recognition of the stimulus [19]. This represents a much later onset than expected from direct projections from inferotemporal cortex [16, 18]. The neural mechanisms underlying this onset remain unclear. To address this issue, we performed a joint analysis of single-cell and LFP responses during a visual recognition task. Single-neuron responses were preceded by a global LFP deflection in the theta range. In addition, there was a local and stimulus-specific increase in the single-trial gamma power. These LFP responses correlated with conscious recognition. The timing of the neurons' firing was phase locked to these LFP responses. We propose that whereas the gamma phase locking reflects the activation of local networks encoding particular recognized stimuli, the theta phase locking reflects a global activation that provides a temporal window for processing consciously perceived stimuli in the MTL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.004

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rey, H. G., Fried, I., & Quian Quiroga, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
299-304
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048286150
Cited by
70
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS084017)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
single neuron responses, local field potentials, medial temporal lobe, visual recognition, conscious perception, theta oscillations, gamma oscillations, phase locking, neuronal synchronization, memory encoding
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Neurons, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review