Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Humans Can Continuously Optimize Energetic Cost during Walking

Selinger, Jessica C., O’Connor, Shawn M., Wong, Jeremy D., Donelan, J. Maxwell·2015·Current Biology

Abstract

People prefer to move in ways that minimize their energetic cost. For example, people tend to walk at a speed that minimizes energy use per unit distance and, for that speed, they select a step frequency that makes walking less costly. Although aspects of this preference appear to be established over both evolutionary and developmental timescales, it remains unclear whether people can also optimize energetic cost in real time. Here we show that during walking, people readily adapt established motor programs to minimize energy use. To accomplish this, we used robotic exoskeletons to shift people's energetically optimal step frequency to frequencies higher and lower than normally preferred. In response, we found that subjects adapted their step frequency to converge on the new energetic optima within minutes and in response to relatively small savings in cost (<5%). When transiently perturbed from their new optimal gait, subjects relied on an updated prediction to rapidly re-converge within seconds. Our collective findings indicate that energetic cost is not just an outcome of movement, but also plays a central role in continuously shaping it.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Srinivasan, 2006, Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running, Nature, 439, 72, 10.1038/nature04113 · DOI
  2. Donelan, 2001, Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking, Proc. Biol. Sci., 268, 1985, 10.1098/rspb.2001.1761 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bertram, 2001, Multiple walking speed-frequency relations are predicted by constrained optimization, J. Theor. Biol., 209, 445, 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2279 · DOI
  4. Zarrugh, 1974, Optimization of energy expenditure during level walking, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol., 33, 293, 10.1007/BF00430237 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Molen, 1972, Graphic representation of the relationship between oxygen-consumption and characteristics of normal gait of the human male, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. C., 75, 305
  6. Elftman, 1966, Biomechanics of muscle with particular application to studies of gait, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 48, 363, 10.2106/00004623-196648020-00017 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ralston, 1958, Energy-speed relation and optimal speed during level walking, Int. Z. Angew. Physiol., 17, 277
  8. Atzler, 1928, Arbeitsphysiologische Studien III, Pflugers Arch., 215, 292
  9. Umberger, 2007, Mechanical power and efficiency of level walking with different stride rates, J. Exp. Biol., 210, 3255, 10.1242/jeb.000950 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Minetti, 1995, Effects of stride frequency on mechanical power and energy expenditure of walking, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 27, 1194, 10.1249/00005768-199508000-00014 · DOI
  11. Holt, 1991, Predicting the minimal energy costs of human walking, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 23, 491, 10.1249/00005768-199104000-00016 · DOI
  12. Rodman, 1980, Bioenergetics and the origin of hominid bipedalism, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 52, 103, 10.1002/ajpa.1330520113 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Sockol, 2007, Chimpanzee locomotor energetics and the origin of human bipedalism, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 12265, 10.1073/pnas.0703267104 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Alexander, 2001, Design by numbers, Nature, 412, 591, 10.1038/35088155 · DOI
  15. Ivanenko, 2007, Development of independent walking in toddlers, Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev., 35, 67, 10.1249/JES.0b013e31803eafa8 · DOI
  16. Tucker, 1970, Energetic cost of locomotion in animals, Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 34, 841, 10.1016/0010-406X(70)91006-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Alexander, 1989, Optimization and gaits in the locomotion of vertebrates, Physiol. Rev., 69, 1199, 10.1152/physrev.1989.69.4.1199 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Franklin, 2011, Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control, Neuron, 72, 425, 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.006 · DOI
  19. Emken, 2007, Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort, J. Neurophysiol., 97, 3997, 10.1152/jn.01095.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Finley, 2013, Learning to be economical: the energy cost of walking tracks motor adaptation, J. Physiol., 591, 1081, 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245506 · DOI
  21. Huang, 2012, Reduction of metabolic cost during motor learning of arm reaching dynamics, J. Neurosci., 32, 2182, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4003-11.2012 · DOI
  22. Bunderson, 2008, Reduction of neuromuscular redundancy for postural force generation using an intrinsic stability criterion, J. Biomech., 41, 1537, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.004 · DOI
  23. Latt, 2008, Walking speed, cadence and step length are selected to optimize the stability of head and pelvis accelerations, Exp. Brain Res., 184, 201, 10.1007/s00221-007-1094-x · DOI
  24. Marsh, 2000, Is a joint moment-based cost function associated with preferred cycling cadence?, J. Biomech., 33, 173, 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00155-4 · DOI
  25. Snaterse, 2011, Distinct fast and slow processes contribute to the selection of preferred step frequency during human walking, J. Appl. Physiol., 110, 1682, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00536.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Tumer, 2007, Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong, Nature, 450, 1240, 10.1038/nature06390 · DOI
  27. Wu, 2014, Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability, Nat. Neurosci., 17, 312, 10.1038/nn.3616 · DOI
  28. Davidson, 2005, Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review, J. Neural Eng., 2, S313, 10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S11 · DOI
  29. Marshall, 1994, Peripheral chemoreceptors and cardiovascular regulation, Physiol. Rev., 74, 543, 10.1152/physrev.1994.74.3.543 · DOI
  30. Shadmehr, 1994, Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task, J. Neurosci., 14, 3208, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-05-03208.1994 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Reisman, 2005, Interlimb coordination during locomotion: what can be adapted and stored?, J. Neurophysiol., 94, 2403, 10.1152/jn.00089.2005 · DOI
  32. Blanchette, 2009, Timing-specific transfer of adapted muscle activity after walking in an elastic force field, J. Neurophysiol., 102, 568, 10.1152/jn.91096.2008 · DOI
  33. Fortin, 2009, Effects of walking in a force field for varying durations on aftereffects and on next day performance, Exp. Brain Res., 199, 145, 10.1007/s00221-009-1989-9 · DOI
  34. Choi, 2007, Adaptation reveals independent control networks for human walking, Nat. Neurosci., 10, 1055, 10.1038/nn1930 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Selinger, J. C., O’Connor, S. M., Wong, J. D., & Donelan, J. M.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
25
Issue
18
Pages
2452-2456
ISSN
0960-9822
Cited by
395
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review