Cited by 150

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early Evolution of Modern Birds Structured by Global Forest Collapse at the End-Cretaceous Mass Extinction

Field, Daniel J., Bercovici, Antoine, Berv, Jacob S., Dunn, Regan, Fastovsky, David E., Lyson, Tyler R., Vajda, Vivi, Gauthier, Jacques A.·2018·Current Biology

Abstract

The fossil record and recent molecular phylogenies support an extraordinary early-Cenozoic radiation of crown birds (Neornithes) after the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) mass extinction [1-3]. However, questions remain regarding the mechanisms underlying the survival of the deepest lineages within crown birds across the K-Pg boundary, particularly since this global catastrophe eliminated even the closest stem-group relatives of Neornithes [4]. Here, ancestral state reconstructions of neornithine ecology reveal a strong bias toward taxa exhibiting predominantly non-arboreal lifestyles across the K-Pg, with multiple convergent transitions toward predominantly arboreal ecologies later in the Paleocene and Eocene. By contrast, ecomorphological inferences indicate predominantly arboreal lifestyles among enantiornithines, the most diverse and widespread Mesozoic avialans [5-7]. Global paleobotanical and palynological data show that the K-Pg Chicxulub impact triggered widespread destruction of forests [8, 9]. We suggest that ecological filtering due to the temporary loss of significant plant cover across the K-Pg boundary selected against any flying dinosaurs (Avialae [10]) committed to arboreal ecologies, resulting in a predominantly non-arboreal post-extinction neornithine avifauna composed of total-clade Palaeognathae, Galloanserae, and terrestrial total-clade Neoaves that rapidly diversified into the broad range of avian ecologies familiar today. The explanation proposed here provi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.062

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Jarvis, 2014, Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds, Science, 346, 1320, 10.1126/science.1253451 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ksepka, 2017, Early Paleocene landbird supports rapid phylogenetic and morphological diversification of crown birds after the K-Pg mass extinction, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 8047, 10.1073/pnas.1700188114 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Longrich, 2011, Mass extinction of birds at the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 15253, 10.1073/pnas.1110395108 · DOI
  4. O’Connor, 2011, Anatomy of the Early Cretaceous enantiornithine bird Rapaxavis pani, Acta Palaeontol. Pol., 56, 463, 10.4202/app.2010.0047 · DOI
  5. Tschudy, 1984, Disruption of the terrestrial plant ecosystem at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, Western interior, Science, 225, 1030, 10.1126/science.225.4666.1030 · DOI
  6. Vajda, 2001, Indication of global deforestation at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary by New Zealand fern spike, Science, 294, 1700, 10.1126/science.1064706 · DOI
  7. Gauthier, 1986, Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds, Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, 8, 1
  8. Reddy, 2017, Why do phylogenomic data sets yield conflicting trees? Data type influences the avian tree of life more than taxon sampling, Syst. Biol., 66, 857, 10.1093/sysbio/syx041 · DOI
  9. Field, 2017, Big-time insights from a tiny bird fossil, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 7750, 10.1073/pnas.1710941114 · DOI
  10. Vajda, 2014, The global vegetation pattern across the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction interval: a template for other extinction events, Global Planet. Change, 122, 29, 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.07.014 · DOI
  11. Clyde, 2016, Direct high-precision U–Pb geochronology of the end-Cretaceous extinction and calibration of Paleocene astronomical timescales, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 452, 272, 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.041 · DOI
  12. Bercovici, 2012, Palynostratigraphy of John’s Nose, a new Cretaceous—Paleogene boundary section in southwestern North Dakota, USA, Palynology, 36, 36, 10.1080/01916122.2012.678695 · DOI
  13. Fastovsky, 2016, The Hell Creek Formation and its contribution to the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction: a short primer, Cretac. Res., 57, 368, 10.1016/j.cretres.2015.07.007 · DOI
  14. Feduccia, 1995, Explosive evolution in tertiary birds and mammals, Science, 267, 637, 10.1126/science.267.5198.637 · DOI
  15. Berv, 2018, Genomic Signature of an Avian Lilliput Effect across the K-Pg Extinction, Syst. Biol., 67, 1, 10.1093/sysbio/syx064 · DOI
  16. Brusatte, 2015, The extinction of the dinosaurs, Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc., 90, 628, 10.1111/brv.12128 · DOI
  17. Field, 2018, Complete Ichthyornis skull illuminates mosaic assembly of the avian head, Nature, 557, 96, 10.1038/s41586-018-0053-y · DOI
  18. Bell, 2016, A species-level phylogeny of the Cretaceous Hesperornithiformes (Aves: Ornithuromorpha): implications for body size evolution amongst the earliest diving birds, J. Syst. Palaeontology, 14, 239, 10.1080/14772019.2015.1036141 · DOI
  19. Larson, 2016, Dental disparity and ecological stability in bird-like dinosaurs prior to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, Curr. Biol., 26, 1325, 10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.039 · DOI
  20. Louchart, 2011, From snout to beak: the loss of teeth in birds, Trends Ecol. Evol., 26, 663, 10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.004 · DOI
  21. O’Connor, 2018, First report of gastroliths in the Early Cretaceous basal bird Jeholornis, Cretac. Res., 84, 200, 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.10.031 · DOI
  22. Wolbach, 1988, Global fire at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, Nature, 334, 665, 10.1038/334665a0 · DOI
  23. Robertson, 2013, K-Pg extinction: reevaluation of the heat-fire hypothesis, J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci., 118, 329, 10.1002/jgrg.20018 · DOI
  24. Ohno, 2014, Production of sulphate-rich vapour during the Chicxulub impact and implications for ocean acidification, Nat. Geosci., 7, 279, 10.1038/ngeo2095 · DOI
  25. Kaiho, 2016, Global climate change driven by soot at the K-Pg boundary as the cause of the mass extinction, Sci. Rep., 6, 28427, 10.1038/srep28427 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Vellekoop, 2016, Evidence for Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary bolide “impact winter” conditions from New Jersey, USA, Geology, 44, 619, 10.1130/G37961.1 · DOI
  27. Bardeen, 2017, On transient climate change at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary due to atmospheric soot injections, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, E7415, 10.1073/pnas.1708980114 · DOI
  28. Brugger, 2017, Baby, it’s cold outside: climate model simulations of the effects of the asteroid impact at the end of the Cretaceous, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 419, 10.1002/2016GL072241 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Vajda, 2015, Nano particles as the primary cause for long-term sunlight suppression at high southern latitudes following the Chicxulub impact—evidence from ejecta deposits in Belize and Mexico, Gondwana Res., 27, 1079, 10.1016/j.gr.2014.05.009 · DOI
  30. Vajda, 2004, Fungal proliferation at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, Science, 303, 1489, 10.1126/science.1093807 · DOI
  31. Wolfe, 1986, Vegetation, climatic and floral changes at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, Nature, 324, 148, 10.1038/324148a0 · DOI
  32. Renne, 2013, Time scales of critical events around the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, Science, 339, 684, 10.1126/science.1230492 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Johnson, 1992, Leaf-fossil evidence for extensive floral extinction at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, North Dakota, USA, Cretac. Res., 13, 91, 10.1016/0195-6671(92)90029-P · DOI
  34. Johnson, 2002, Megaflora of the Hell Creek and lower Fort Union Formations in the western Dakotas: vegetational response to climate change, the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary event, and rapid marine transgression, Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am., 361, 329
  35. Bercovici, 2008, Detailed palaeontologic and taphonomic techniques to reconstruct an earliest Paleocene fossil flora: an example from southwestern North Dakota, USA, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 151, 136, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2008.03.004 · DOI
  36. Vajda, 2007, Extinction and recovery patterns of the vegetation across the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary—a tool for unravelling the causes of the end-Permian mass-extinction, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 144, 99, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2005.09.007 · DOI
  37. Johnson, 2002, A tropical rainforest in Colorado 1.4 million years after the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, Science, 296, 2379, 10.1126/science.1072102 · DOI
  38. Lee, 2017, Avian species and functional diversity in agricultural landscapes: does landscape heterogeneity matter?, PLoS ONE, 12, e0170540, 10.1371/journal.pone.0170540 · DOI
  39. Dumont, 2016, Synchrotron imaging of dentition provides insights into the biology of Hesperornis and Ichthyornis, the “last” toothed birds, BMC Evol. Biol., 16, 178, 10.1186/s12862-016-0753-6 · DOI
  40. Schulte, 2010, The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, Science, 327, 1214, 10.1126/science.1177265 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Feng, 2017, Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, E5864, 10.1073/pnas.1704632114 · DOI
  42. Norberg, 1979, Morphology of the wings, legs and tail of three coniferous forest tits, the goldcrest, and the treecreeper in relation to locomotor pattern and feeding station selection, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 287, 131, 10.1098/rstb.1979.0054 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Hsiang, 2015, The origin of snakes: revealing the ecology, behavior, and evolutionary history of early snakes using genomics, phenomics, and the fossil record, BMC Evol. Biol., 15, 87, 10.1186/s12862-015-0358-5 · DOI
  44. Paradis, 2004, APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language, Bioinformatics, 20, 289, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Revell, 2012, Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things), Methods Ecol. Evol., 3, 217, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x · DOI
  46. Bollback, 2006, SIMMAP: stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies, BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 88, 10.1186/1471-2105-7-88 · DOI
  47. Schliep, 2011, phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R, Bioinformatics, 27, 592, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Field, D. J., Bercovici, A., Berv, J. S., Dunn, R., Fastovsky, D. E., Lyson, T. R., Vajda, V., & Gauthier, J. A.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
1825-1831.e2
ISSN
0960-9822
Cited by
150
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • University of Bath
  • Smithsonian NMNH
  • Swedish Research Council VR (2015-4264)
  • NSF (DGE-1650441, DEB-1700786)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review