The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech
Open accessAbstract
During speech perception, a central task of the auditory cortex is to analyze complex acoustic patterns to allow detection of the words that encode a linguistic message [1]. It is generally thought that this process includes at least one intermediate, phonetic, level of representations [2-6], localized bilaterally in the superior temporal lobe [7-9]. Phonetic representations reflect a transition from acoustic to linguistic information, classifying acoustic patterns into linguistically meaningful units, which can serve as input to mechanisms that access abstract word representations [10, 11]. While recent research has identified neural signals arising from successful recognition of individual words in continuous speech [12-15], no explicit neurophysiological signal has been found demonstrating the transition from acoustic and/or phonetic to symbolic, lexical representations. Here, we report a response reflecting the incremental integration of phonetic information for word identification, dominantly localized to the left temporal lobe. The short response latency, approximately 114 ms relative to phoneme onset, suggests that phonetic information is used for lexical processing as soon as it becomes available. Responses also tracked word boundaries, confirming previous reports of immediate lexical segmentation [16, 17]. These new results were further investigated using a cocktail-party paradigm [18, 19] in which participants listened to a mix of two talkers, attending to one and ignoring the other. Analysis indicates neural lexical processing of only the attended, but not the unattended, speech stream. Thus, while responses to acoustic features reflect attention through selective amplification of attended speech, responses consistent with a lexical processing model reveal categorically selective processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Desikan, R. S., Ségonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B. T., Dickerson, B. C., Blacker, D., Buckner, R. L., Dale, A. M., Maguire, R. P., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · Cited by 13,324
Fischl, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 · Cited by 9,526
Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples
Nichols, T. E., & Holmes, A. P. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1058 · Cited by 6,256
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
SMITH, S., & NICHOLS, T. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061 · Cited by 5,250
Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears
Cherry, E. C. (1953) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907229 · Cited by 4,549
MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python
Gramfort, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 · Cited by 3,784
The TRACE model of speech perception
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 · Cited by 2,956
Cited by
Neural Entrainment and Attentional Selection in the Listening Brain
Obleser, J., & Kayser, C. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.08.004 · Cited by 432
A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension
Heilbron, M., Armeni, K., Schoffelen, J.-M., Hagoort, P., & de Lange, F. P. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2201968119 · Cited by 343
Brains and algorithms partially converge in natural language processing
Caucheteux, C., & King, J.-R. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03036-1 · Cited by 318
A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension
(2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.03.410399 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Brodbeck, C., Hong, L. E., & Simon, J. Z.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3976-3983.e5
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903324034
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.042
- The paper
- Brodbeck, C., Hong, L. E., & Simon, J. Z. (2018). Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.