Cited by 45Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Rat 50 kHz calls reflect graded tickling-induced positive emotion.

Open access
Hinchcliffe, Justyna K., Mendl, Michael, Robinson, Emma S.J.·2020·Current Biology

Abstract

Positive animal emotion (affect) is a key component of good animal welfare [1] and plays an important role in stress-coping and resilience [2]. Methods for reliably inducing and measuring positive affect are critical, but both have been limited in availability. In rats, one promising way of inducing positive affective states is by human-simulated rough and tumble play or 'tickling' [3,4]. However, in humans tickling induces both pleasure and displeasure, and neither an established non-verbal indicator of positive affect, the Duchenne smile, nor laughter detects this variation [5,6]. Rats also show individual differences in response to tickling [7], and this variation needs to be readily quantified if we are to ensure that tickling is only implemented where it generates positive affect. Here, we use a validated and objective measure of affective valence, the affective bias test [8], to show that 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations provide a quantifiable and graded measure of positive affect that accurately reflects the positive state induced by this human-rat interaction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.038

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]Kalisch R. Müller M.B. Tüscher O. A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience Behav. Brain Sci. 38 2015 e92 25158686
  2. [4]Burgdorf J. Panksepp J. Tickling induces reward in adolescent rats Physiol. Behav. 72 2001 167 173 11239994
  3. [8]Hinchcliffe J.K. Stuart S.A. Mendl M. Robinson E.S.J. Further validation of the affective bias test for predicting antidepressant and pro-depressant risk: effects of pharmacological and social manipulations in male and female rats Psychopharmacol 234 2017 3105 3116 PMC5597685 28735366
  4. [9]Rygula R. Pluta H. Popik P. Laughing rats are optimistic PLoS One 7 2012 e51959 23300582 PMC3530570

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinchcliffe, J. K., Mendl, M., & Robinson, E. S. J.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Mendl, Michael
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
30
Issue
18
Pages
R1034-R1035
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087483375
Cited by
45
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of Bristol
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L011212/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
tickling, positive affect, emotional valence, 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations, rats, rough-and-tumble play, animal welfare, individual differences
MeSH terms
Affect, Animals, Emotions, Humans, Male, Physical Stimulation, Sensation, Touch, Ultrasonics, Vocalization, Animal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review