Cited by 23Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHumor Studies and Applications

Who’s laughing? Play, tickling and ultrasonic vocalizations in rats.

Open access
Burke, C. J., Pellis, S. M., Achterberg, E. J. M.·2022·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B

Abstract

Social play in rats is a highly rewarding, energetic form of social interaction and important for development of the brain and social skills. The 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) emitted during social play are thought to be an expression of a positive affective state (laughter), which in some situations may also function as communication signals. Heterospecific play, ‘tickling’ by an experimenter, is thought to simulate conspecific play, and has been used to improve welfare and to study the neurobiology of positive affect. Given that tickling evokes substantial amounts of USV, we investigated whether heterospecific play is simulating conspecific play by comparing USV-behaviour associations in both contexts. If the 50 kHz calls are merely an expression of ‘laughter’ then the pattern and type of emission in both contexts should be similar. By contrast, as playing with a conspecific involves a two-way exchange of signalling, the additional demands on communication should lead to a different pattern of calling. While calling was prevalent in both types of play, how the different types of 50 kHz calls are used in the two contexts differed markedly. The findings suggest that while conspecific and heterospecific play are positive experiences, tickling is not the equivalent of conspecific play. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Cracking the laugh code: laughter through the lens of biology, psychology and neuroscience’.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2021.0184

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Burke et al. (2022) suggested that for male rats being pinned during tickling may be important for production of USVs in comparison to social play where de-vocalisation studies show that it is typically the rat doing the pinning that emits these calls.

    “Burke et al. (2022) suggested that for male rats being pinned during tickling may be important for production of USVs in comparison to social play where de-vocalisation studies show that it is typically the rat doing the pinning that emits these calls ( Burke et al., 2018).”

    From Stage 2 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats (2025) · cites this paper as Burke et al., 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable, 1 not checked. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Burke et al. (2022) propose that the lack of correlation between trills and specific tickling behaviour indicates that trills are produced relatively indiscriminately during tickling, potentially due to the lack of a conspecific play partner.

    “Burke et al. (2022) propose that the lack of correlation between trills and specific tickling behaviour indicates that trills are produced relatively indiscriminately during tickling, potentially due to the lack of a conspecific play partner.”

    From Stage 2 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats (2025) · cites this paper as Burke et al. (2022)

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable, 1 not checked. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In male rats the strongest associations between USVs and behaviour in social play are between approaching, following and nape contact, whereas with tickling the strongest association is with pinning.

    “In male rats the strongest associations between USVs and behaviour in social play are between approaching, following and nape contact whereas with tickling the strongest association is with pinning ( Burke et al., 2022; they applied the standard tickling protocol).”
  • Burke et al. (2022) report that in social play, the strongest associations between behaviour and USVs involve frequency modulated (trill) calls, whereas in tickling the strongest associations involve flat calls.

    “Burke et al. (2022) report that in social play, the strongest associations between behaviour and USVs involve frequency modulated (trill) calls, whereas in tickling the strongest associations involve flat calls.”
  • Another distinctive difference between social play and tickling in the Burke et al. (2022) study were the correlations between behaviours and sub-types of USVs.

    “Another distinctive difference between social play and tickling in the Burke et al., (2022) study were the correlations between behaviours and sub-types of USVs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Pellis SM, Pellis VC. 2009. The playful brain . Oxford, UK: OneWorld Publications. [Google Scholar]
  2. [56]Burke CJ, Pellis SM, Achterberg EJM. 2022. Data from: Who's laughing? Play, tickling and ultrasonic vocalisations in rats. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.fn2z34tvc) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] · DOI
  3. Burke CJ, Pellis SM, Achterberg EJM. 2022. Data from: Who's laughing? Play, tickling and ultrasonic vocalisations in rats. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.fn2z34tvc) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burke, C. J., Pellis, S. M., & Achterberg, E. J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lethbridge (CA)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Burke, C. J.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
Published
2022-09-21
Volume
377
Issue
1863
Pages
20210184-20210184
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W4296781468
Cited by
23
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (2018-03706)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PGSD3)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.Veni.181.039)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
Keywords
social play, tickling, ultrasonic vocalizations, 50-kHz calls, positive affect, animal welfare, communication signals, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Emotions, Reward, Ultrasonics, Vocalization, Animal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review