Cited by 85Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesStress Responses and CortisolTactile and Sensory Interactions

Rat tickling: A systematic review of applications, outcomes, and moderators.

Open access
LaFollette, Megan R., O’Haire, Marguerite E., Cloutier, Sylvie, Blankenberger, Whitney B., Gaskill, Brianna N.·2017·PLOS ONE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rats initially fear humans which can increase stress and impact study results. Additionally, studying positive affective states in rats has proved challenging. Rat tickling is a promising habituation technique that can also be used to model and measure positive affect. However, current studies use a variety of methods to achieve differential results. Our objective was to systematically identify, summarize, and evaluate the research on tickling in rats to provide direction for future investigation. Our specific aims were to summarize current methods used in tickling experiments, outcomes from tickling, and moderating factors. METHODS: We systematically evaluated all articles about tickling identified from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsychInfo. Our inclusion criteria were publication in a peer-reviewed journal and collection of original, empirical data on rats using the handling method of tickling. One researcher extracted information from each article. Bias was assessed by 2 investigators using the SYRCLE bias assessment tool. RESULTS: We identified 32 articles (56 experiments) published in peer-reviewed journals about rat tickling for inclusion. A wide variety of strains, sexes, and ages of rats were included. The most common method used for tickling was cycling through 15 seconds of tickling and 15 seconds of rest for 2 minutes for 3 to 5 days. Experiments with a control for tickling (N = 22) showed that tickling increases positive vocalization, approach behavior, decreases anxiety measures, improves handling, and in some cases decreases stress hormones. Tickling juvenile, individually housed rats with a trait predisposition to respond more positively to tickling, results in the most positive outcomes. Methods to reduce bias were insufficiently reported. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that tickling is a promising method for improving rat welfare and investigating positive affect. However, the establishment of tickling best practices is essential as the outcomes from tickling can be moderated by several factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0175320

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rats find tickling rewarding, as tickled rats show reduced latency for approaching the human hand and can be trained to perform operant responses for tickling.

    “Other evidence suggests that rats find tickling rewarding as in addition to production of USVs, tickled rats show a reduced latency for approaching the human hand and can be trained to perform operant responses for tickling ( Burgdorf & Panksepp, 2001; LaFollette et al., 2017).”

    From Stage 2 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats (2025) · cites this paper as LaFollette et al., 2017

    The Results section (‘Approach behavior’; page unavailable) reports that nine of ten experiments assessing approach found positive results, including decreased approach latency. The review also discusses tickling’s reward value, but the passages in our copy do not report rats being trained to perform operant responses for tickling. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Over 60% of papers on tickling used rats within the 3-4 to 7 week age window.

    “We purchased the rats from CRL (16 at a time), aged 3-4 weeks and completed the research prior to their puberty around 7 weeks of age as over 60% of papers on tickling used rats within this time window ( LaFollette et al., 2017).”

    From Stage 2 Registered Report: Refinement of tickling protocols to improve positive animal welfare in laboratory rats (2025) · cites this paper as LaFollette et al., 2017

    Table 3 (Results, Characteristics of tickling; page unavailable) lists many studies using rats aged 21–49 days, consistent with the stated age window. The Discussion (Outcomes of tickling; page unavailable) reports that 81% of experiments used singly housed rats under 50 days old, but it does not establish that over 60% of papers used rats throughout the specified 3–4-to-7-week window. The reported percentage also counts experiments, not papers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Play fighting between rats, as well as play between a rat and a human, are known to elicit intense 50 kHz calling, while threatening scenarios, such as an intruder or exposure to a predator, are more commonly associated with 22 kHz calls.

    “Play fighting between rats, as well as play between a rat and a human, are known to elicit intense 50 kHz calling,20,25 while threatening scenarios, such as an intruder or exposure to a predator is more commonly associated with 22 kHz calls.46”
  • Wistar rats have been shown to be reliably responsive to tickling and PH.

    “This outbred albino strain has been shown to be reliably responsive to tickling and PH ( Bombail et al., 2019; Hammond et al., 2019) and is one of the commonly used strains for such experiments (23% of rat tickling studies used Wistar rats; LaFollette et al., 2017).”
  • When rats are tickled by the human hand, they often produce 50 kHz USVs, which are understood to indicate positive affect in rats.

    “Research (see Bombail et al., 2021; LaFollette et al., 2017 for reviews) has shown that when rats are tickled by the human hand, they often produce 50 kHz USVs, which are understood to indicate positive affect in rats ( e.g., Barker, 2018, Figure 2i).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [52]Mällo T, Matrov D, Kõiv K, Harro J. Effect of chronic stress on behavior and cerebral oxidative metabolism in rats with high or low positive affect. Neuroscience. 2009; 164(3): 963– 74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.08.041 19706319 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LaFollette, M. R., O’Haire, M. E., Cloutier, S., Blankenberger, W. B., & Gaskill, B. N.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Canadian Council on Animal Care (CA)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
LaFollette, Megan R.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2017-04-06
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
e0175320
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604855621
Cited by
84
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
positive affect, animal welfare, habituation, handling stress, anxiety, stress hormones, vocalizations, approach behavior, rat strain differences, young rats, individual housing, research bias
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Communication, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Touch, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review