Cited by 66Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesIon Channels and Receptors

Spatially Distributed Representation of Taste Quality in the Gustatory Insular Cortex of Behaving Mice

Open access
Chen, Ke, Kogan, Joshua F., Fontanini, Alfredo·2021·Current Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices are topographically organized, with neurons responding to similar sensory features clustering in adjacent portions of the cortex. Such topography has not been observed in the piriform cortex, whose responses to odorants are sparsely distributed across the cortex. The spatial organization of taste responses in the gustatory insular cortex (GC) is currently debated, with conflicting evidence from anesthetized rodents pointing to alternative and mutually exclusive models. Here, we rely on calcium imaging to determine how taste and task-related variables are represented in the superficial layers of GC of alert, licking mice. Our data show that the various stimuli evoke sparse responses from a combination of broadly and narrowly tuned neurons. Analysis of the distribution of responses over multiple spatial scales demonstrates that taste representations are distributed across the cortex, with no sign of spatial clustering or topography. Altogether, data presented here support the idea that the representation of taste qualities in GC of alert mice is sparse and distributed, analogous to the representation of odorants in piriform cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.014

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human and mouse imaging studies have shown that taste quality is not represented topographically, but by a distributed population code in the insula.

    “Instead, human and mouse imaging studies have shown that taste quality is not represented topographically, but by a distributed population code in the insula [39,41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, K., Kogan, J. F., & Fontanini, A.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Stony Brook School (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Ke
  • Fontanini, Alfredo
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
247-256.e4
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3106104252
Cited by
66
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-01-25)
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
spatial topography, sparse coding, distributed representations, piriform cortex, calcium imaging, licking behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Male, Neurons, Odorants, Taste, Models, Animal, Mice, Taste Perception, Optical Imaging, Spatial Analysis, Piriform Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review