Cited by 379Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesTactile and Sensory Interactions

A Gustotopic Map of Taste Qualities in the Mammalian Brain

Open access
Chen, Xiaoke, Gabitto, Mariano, Peng, Yueqing, Ryba, Nicholas J. P., Zuker, Charles S.·2011·Science

Abstract

Nonoverlapping hot spots for different classes of taste stimuli map topographically in the mouse insular cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1204076

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The insula receives inputs from gustatory, auditory, visual, olfactory, and somatosensory modalities.

    “It receives inputs from a variety of sensory modalities, encompassing gustatory, auditory, visual, olfactory, and somatosensory signals [5,[34][35][36][37][38].”

    From The Insular Cortex: An Interface Between Sensation, Emotion and Cognition (2024) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Abstract identifies the insula as the primary taste cortex receiving information from taste cells. The Concluding Remarks say it responds to more than taste and is thought to be a site of multisensory integration, but do not specify auditory, visual, olfactory, or somatosensory inputs to the insula. The paper discusses those modalities elsewhere in comparisons with other cortical areas, not as documented insular inputs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, X., Gabitto, M., Peng, Y., Ryba, N. J. P., & Zuker, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (US)
Corresponding author
Zuker, Charles S.
Venue
Science
Published
2011-09-02
Volume
333
Issue
6047
Pages
1262-1266
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2015155463
Cited by
379
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 32
FWCI
24.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (Z01DE000561, ZIADE000561)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
primary gustatory cortex, taste coding, sweet taste, bitter taste, umami taste, salty taste, taste cells, mice, two-photon calcium imaging
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cycloheximide, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Sodium Chloride, Sodium Glutamate, Sweetening Agents, Taste, Taste Buds, Mice, Knockout, Mice, Molecular Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review