CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Identifying archaeological leather – discussing the potential of grain pattern analysis and zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry (ZooMS) through a case study involving medieval shoe parts from Denmark

Ebsen, Jannie Amsgaard, Haase, Kirstine, Larsen, René, Sommer, Dorte Vestergaard Poulsen, Brandt, Luise Ørsted·2019·Journal of Cultural Heritage
DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Where cold, arid, or oxygen-deprived environments have permitted exceptional organic survival, paleoproteomics has been applied to understand manufacturing of clothing, garments, and textiles such as leather and skin garments, woolen textiles and other fibers, and silks.

    “Where cold, arid, or oxygen-deprived environments have permitted exceptional organic survival, paleoproteomics has also been applied to understand manufacturing of clothing, garments, and textiles such as leather and skin garments (57, 128, 129), woolen textiles, and other fibers (130–132) and silks (133, 134).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [57]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Schmidt, 2011, Identification of animal species in skin clothing from museum collections, Proceedings ICOM-CC Lisbon: 16th Triennial Conference of the International Council
  2. Brandt, 2014, Species identification of archaeological skin objects from Danish bogs: comparison between mass spectrometry-based peptide sequencing and microscopy-based methods, PLoS One, 9, e106875, 10.1371/journal.pone.0106875 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hofreiter, 2015, The future of ancient DNA: technical advances and conceptual shifts, Bioessays, 37, 284, 10.1002/bies.201400160 · DOI
  4. Service, 2015, Protein power, Science, 349, 372, 10.1126/science.349.6246.372 · DOI
  5. Teasdale, 2015, Paging through history: parchment as a reservoir of ancient DNA for next generation sequencing, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 370, 20130379, 10.1098/rstb.2013.0379 · DOI
  6. O'Sullivan, 2016, A whole mitochondria analysis of the Tyrolean Iceman's leather provides insights into the animal sources of Copper Age clothing, Sci. Rep., 10.1038/srep31279 · DOI
  7. Schröder, 2016, Ancient DNA identification of domestic animals used for leather objects in Central Asia during the Bronze Age, Holocene, 26, 1722, 10.1177/0959683616641741 · DOI
  8. Schlumbaum, 2010, a Neolithic legging from the Swiss Alps and the early history of goat, J. Archaeol. Sci., 37, 1247, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.025 · DOI
  9. Hughes, 1986, Body in the bog but no DNA, Nature, 323, 208, 10.1038/323208c0 · DOI
  10. Vuissoz, 2007, The survival of PCR-amplifiable DNA in cow leather, J. Archaeol. Sci., 34, 823, 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.002 · DOI
  11. Toniolo, 2012, The Silk Road, Marco Polo, a Bible and its proteome: a detective story, J. Proteomics., 75, 3365, 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.03.051 · DOI
  12. Fiddyment, 2015, Animal origin of 13th-century uterine vellum revealed using noninvasive peptide fingerprinting, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112, 15066, 10.1073/pnas.1512264112 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kirby, 2013, Identification of collagen-based materials in cultural heritage, Analyst, 138, 4849, 10.1039/c3an00925d · DOI · Paper page
  14. Larsen, 2009, Dorte Vestergaard Poulsen, Lotta Rahme, Læder, pergament og skind Fremstilling, historie og nedbrydning. 5. reviderede udgave, Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademi
  15. Botfeldt, 2007, Konservering af arkaeologisk vanddrukkent laeder, Meddelelser Om Konservering., 25
  16. Thomson, 2011, Skin, leather and tanning: some definitions, Leather Tanneries Archaeol. Evidence, 3
  17. Falcão, 2018, Vegetable tannins used in the manufacture of historic leathers, Molecules, 23, 10.3390/molecules23051081 · DOI
  18. Chahine, 1987, Nettoyage de cuirs archeologiques gorgés d’eau, ICOM.-CC, 8th Triennial Meeting, 939
  19. Chahine, 1997, Study on the stability of leather treated with polyethylene glycol, ICOM-CC Working Group No 10 Conservation of Leathercraft and Related Objects. Interim Symposium, 77
  20. Larsen, 1991, Identifikation og karakterisering af arkæologisk læder ved hjælp af aminosyreanalyse og måling af krympningstemperatur, Identifikation Nedbrudt Arkæol.
  21. Cameron, 1990, Evidence of Leather on Finds from Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries at St Stephen's Lane/Buttermarket, Ipswich, Suffolk 1987-88 and Boss Hall, Ipswich, English Heritage, 2004
  22. Rast-Eicher, 2016, Fibres: microscopy of archaeological textiles and furs, Archaeolingua Alapítvány
  23. Larsen, 1989, Læderidentifikation: bestemmelse af dyreart mv, Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademi, Konservatorskolen
  24. Thomson, 1981, Leather manufacture in the post-medieval period with special reference to Northamptonshire, Post-Medieval Archaeol., 15, 161, 10.1179/pma.1981.003 · DOI
  25. Buckley, 2009, Species identification by analysis of bone collagen using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry,, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 23, 3843, 10.1002/rcm.4316 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Buckley, 2010, Distinguishing between archaeological sheep and goat bones using a single collagen peptide, J. Archaeol. Sci., 37, 13, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Richter, 2011, Fish’n chips: ZooMS peptide mass fingerprinting in a 96 well plate format to identify fish bone fragments, J. Archaeol. Sci., 38, 1502, 10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.014 · DOI
  28. Strohalm, 2008, mMass data miner: an open source alternative for mass spectrometric data analysis, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 22, 905, 10.1002/rcm.3444 · DOI
  29. Madsen, 1985, Sudergade, Skalk, Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademi, Konservatorskolen, 9
  30. Petersen, 1985, To somre i Ribes kloakker, Mark Og Montre., 99
  31. Søvsø, 2004, ASR 1843 Sønderportsgade i Ribe, Unpublished excavation report. Museum of South Western Denmark, Det Kongelige Danske Kunstakademi, Konservatorskolen
  32. Iversen, 2005, Viborg Søndersø 1018-1030: Arkæologi og naturvidenskab i et værkstedsområde fra Vikingetid, Aarhus Universitetsforlag
  33. Haase, 2017, OBM9776 I. Vilhelm Werners Plads, Excavation report, Odense City Museums
  34. Ebsen, 2018, Species identification by grain pattern analysis. Archaeological leather shoe fragmentsfrom the medieval cities of Ribe, Viborg and Odense, Unpublished report from Odense Bys Museer
  35. Buckley, 2014, Species identification of archaeological marine mammals using collagen fingerprinting, J. Archaeol. Sci., 41, 631, 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.021 · DOI
  36. Carşote, 2016, Study of the effect of tannins and animal species on the thermal stability of vegetable leather by differential scanning calorimetry, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 124, 1255, 10.1007/s10973-016-5344-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ebsen, J. A., Haase, K., Larsen, R., Sommer, D. V. P., & Brandt, L. Ø.
Venue
Journal of Cultural Heritage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
39
Pages
21-31
ISSN
1296-2074
DOI
10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.008
Cited by
52
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
  • Carlsbergfondet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review