Cited by 29Digital Media Forensic DetectionSpeech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio Processing

Audio–visual deepfake detection using articulatory representation learning

Wang, Yujia, Huang, Hua·2024·Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cviu.2024.104133

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent multimodal deepfake detection research has begun to exploit richer behavioral and biometric correspondences between face, voice, and motion.

    “Beyond temporal synchronization, recent multimodal deepfake detection research has begun to exploit richer behavioral and biometric correspondences between face, voice, and motion [16-20].”

    From A Review of Tools and Technologies to Combat Deepfakes (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., & Huang, H.
Affiliations
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Hua
Venue
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
248
Pages
104133
ISSN
1077-3142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401798331
Cited by
28
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Vision and Image Understanding (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
articulatory representation, articulatory features, audio encoder, self-supervised learning, multimodal fusion, audio-visual consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review